Fact check: At the jan 6 insurrection, who was ultimately responsible for calling the national guard to help protect the lawmakers at the capitol building?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller was ultimately responsible for calling the National Guard to protect lawmakers at the Capitol building on January 6, 2021. The official government timeline shows that D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser requested additional assistance around 2 p.m. on January 6, and Miller immediately responded by calling up 1,100 members of the D.C. National Guard ^[1].

However, the analyses reveal a more complex chain of events. District of Columbia officials had already requested some National Guard assistance when the protests were initially planned for January 5-6, 2021 ^[1]. The Pentagon, which has authority over the D.C. National Guard, initially denied requests for deployment of Guardsmen before ultimately approving the response ^[2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question omits several critical pieces of context that emerge from the analyses:

• Pre-event planning and directives: Days before January 6, President Trump met with senior Pentagon leaders and directed them to ensure the events were safe, including using the National Guard if necessary ^[3]. This contradicts narratives that suggest Trump was uninvolved in security preparations.
• Pentagon leadership delays: Senior Pentagon officials unnecessarily delayed the D.C. National Guard response due to concerns about "optics" rather than prioritizing the protection of lives and property ^{[3] [4]}. The Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight released transcripts suggesting that Pentagon leaders ignored Trump's directives to keep January 6 peaceful ^{[3] [4]}.
• Congressional leadership role: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi acknowledged responsibility for Capitol security on the House side and controlled House operations, though the analyses don't directly state she called for National Guard deployment ^[5].
• Contradictory official reports: Department of Defense Inspector General transcripts contradict the findings published in their January 6 report, suggesting the official narrative may be incomplete or inaccurate ^[4].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains an embedded assumption by referring to January 6 as an "insurrection," which represents a specific political characterization of the events rather than neutral terminology. This framing could influence how readers interpret the response and reflects a particular viewpoint about the nature of the events.

Additionally, the question's focus solely on "who called the National Guard" oversimplifies a complex situation involving multiple levels of government, pre-existing security preparations, and conflicting accounts of decision-making processes. The analyses suggest that various parties - including Trump, Pentagon leadership, D.C. officials, and Congressional leadership - all played roles in the security response, making the question of "ultimate responsibility" more nuanced than a simple identification of one individual.