Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500
Fact check: LMAO. No. Not even remotely the same. Full stop. Here are some Jan 6th FACTS. trump is fundamentally anti-American and a traitor to this country and everything we value in a democracy. Leading up to Jan 6th trump and his legal team knowingly spread lies about voter fraud, had Fox “news” spread those lies and the anchors (like that dumb fuck tuck) were laughing behind the backs of magats that they could be dumb enough to believe the idiotic lies. Then they got slapped with the biggest defamation lawsuit in history (almost $787 million dollars). Giuliani (now disbarred) said in trial it was his first amendment right to lie to the American people, and he lost. On Jan 6th trump knowingly and illegally submitted false electors for 7 states. Giuliani gave a speech before trump saying “trial by combat” and trump gave a speech inciting his sycophantic cult members to storm the capital to delay the certification of the vote - one of the most democratic processes in this country, and they were successful through violence. While this was happening trump and his legal team were calling senators saying shit like “hey, you should probably certify my [false] electors, look how mad these people are.” Thank god Mike Pence was the most patriotic man that day (which I thought I would never say but here we are) as he refused to fall in line with trump’s illegal, unconstitutional, and anti-American plan. trump tweeted that Pence “didn’t have the courage to do what needed to be done” to his followers already rioting, hence the “HANG MIKE PENCE” chants. trump sat in his room for THREE FUCKING HOURS watching the riots, with family and staff members begging him to call off his mob the whole time, and he only did it after that traitor Babbit was shot and killed. trump doesn’t even deny any of this, because it’s all fact and public record, but instead pushed for the stacked Supreme Court to give him immunity to any of the crimes he committed. Actually insane that the right (small government much?) supports this. It proves they have the true TDS as trump can do nothing wrong in their eyes and deserves special treatment. But go off a your both sides bullshit, we all know how disingenuous you are. Someone killing a CEO who directly caused the suffering and death of Americans is NOT EVEN CLOSE the same as the president of the united states trying to overturn an election he knew was valid and he knew he lost, going against the will of the American people, and using violence and his sycophantic cult to delay the certification of the vote. The attack on a nation and its people is not the same as killing a selfish, psychopathic, CEO. Not even fucking close. You are absolutely deranged if you think those two are even remotely similar. I’ve fucking had it with idiots denying facts and glossing over Jan 6 and trying to compare to shit like this. Absolutely brain dead take. Fucked up and delusional.
Checked on December 11, 2024
1. Summary of the results
1. Summary of the results:
The original statement accurately describes several key events of January 6th, including Trump's 187-minute delay in responding to the riot, his tweet about Mike Pence, and the presence of violence at the Capitol. The statement is supported by evidence regarding Trump's false election fraud claims and Pence's refusal to participate in efforts to overturn the election results.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints:
- The statement omits that multiple Republican officials and Trump administration members, not just Mike Pence, opposed the efforts to overturn the election results
- The role of other key figures like Mark Meadows and Pat Cipollone in the events is not mentioned
- The complex legal context surrounding presidential immunity claims is oversimplified - this is a constitutional question that predates Trump's presidency
- The statement doesn't mention that some Trump supporters and Republican leaders have argued that Trump's speech was protected under First Amendment rights and that he didn't explicitly call for violence
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement:
- The highly emotional language and personal attacks ("dumb fuck," "traitor," "cult members") reduce credibility and obscure factual information
- The statement presents complex legal matters (like presidential immunity) as simple black-and-white issues
- It makes several claims about private conversations and motivations that aren't directly verifiable from the provided analyses
- The characterization of Fox News' defamation settlement as proof of intentional deception oversimplifies a complex legal case that was settled without admission of guilt
- The statement makes definitive claims about Trump's personal knowledge and intentions ("knowingly spread lies") which, while possibly true, aren't directly provable from the available evidence
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?