Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Has Jasmine Crockett faced any backlash for her statements on racism?
Executive Summary
Rep. Jasmine Crockett has both been the target of racist attacks and faced criticism for some of her own remarks; public responses vary depending on the actor and the allegation. Coverage shows two distinct patterns: conservative figures and activists have launched racially charged attacks against her, while some of her comments — notably a 2024 remark about Latino voters described as “slave mentality” — drew criticism and calls for apology [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. A sustained wave of racist attacks from the far right and state officials
Reporting documents instances where far-right activists and some state leaders publicly attacked Crockett using racialized language. In September 2025, far-right activist Laura Loomer directed a racist social-media rant at Crockett, which amplified online backlash and prompted responses from both critics and supporters [1] [2]. Earlier, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott publicly accused Crockett of racism during a dispute over redistricting, an allegation made without presented evidence and criticized by observers as politically motivated and racially charged [5]. The pattern shows Crockett repeatedly targeted by adversaries using race as a weapon, and those attacks generated media coverage that framed her as a frequent target of racially tinged criticism from conservative actors [1] [2] [5].
2. Instances where Crockett herself drew public backlash for controversial language
Crockett has also faced backlash for remarks characterized by detractors as offensive. A December 2024 article highlights a comment attributed to Crockett describing certain Latino voters in terms that opponents called a “slave mentality,” which provoked outrage and demands for apology from critics and community leaders [3]. That incident illustrates how backlash against Crockett is not one-sided: while she is often the target of racist attacks, she has at times used language that prompted condemnation and political fallout, particularly among groups she referenced. Coverage of that episode treated the critique as a substantive challenge to her messaging and political judgment [3].
3. Political spats that get framed as racial disputes on both sides
Several confrontations involving Crockett escalate quickly into accusations of racism, with both Crockett and her opponents accusing one another of racist behavior or speech. A 2024 House hearing exchange with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene resulted in Crockett labeling Greene’s comments “absolutely” racist, drawing national attention to the racial and gender dynamics of the dispute [4]. Separately, Crockett’s remarks about Rep. Byron Donalds’ interracial marriage generated accusations that Crockett herself had crossed a line, showing how charges of racism are used as counterpunches in partisan battles [6]. These episodes show media and political actors often frame interpersonal disputes through a racial lens, intensifying backlash and public interest [6] [4].
4. Media patterns: attack coverage versus accountability coverage
News outlets present two recurring narratives: one emphasizing Crockett as a victim of racist harassment and another highlighting instances where her own words provoked legitimate criticism. Coverage of Loomer’s rant and Abbott’s accusation emphasizes targeted racial attacks against a Black congresswoman [1] [2] [5]. Conversely, reporting on the “slave mentality” comment treated it as a moment of accountability, documenting calls for apology and community reaction [3]. The dual narratives reflect newsroom choices: some pieces foreground harassment and threats to democratic discourse, while others prioritize scrutiny of a public official’s language and its political consequences [1] [3].
5. Bottom line — a mixed record that fuels divergent reactions
Taken together, the sources show Crockett both enduring racially motivated attacks and provoking backlash through controversial comments. The public response depends heavily on who is speaking and the political context: conservative activists and officials have repeatedly weaponized race against her, while critics from other quarters have held her to account for statements deemed offensive or divisive [1] [2] [5] [3] [4]. Readers should note the timeline: harassment episodes reported in 2025 sit alongside earlier controversies from 2023–2024, creating a composite picture where Crockett is simultaneously a target of racist attacks and an actor whose remarks have sometimes sparked legitimate criticism [1] [2] [5] [3] [6].