Which bills has jasmine crockett introduced on the israel-hamas conflict and what are their key provisions?

Checked on February 3, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett’s public record on the IsraelHamas war is a mix of floor votes on large aid packages, sponsor or cosponsor listings cited by third‑party trackers for a pair of House resolutions, and public statements praising ceasefire diplomacy; however, the source material provided does not give a clear, comprehensive list of standalone bills she personally introduced specifically on the Israel‑Hamas conflict and their full text or provisions [1] [2] [3]. Reporting and advocacy outlets emphasize different elements—some focusing on votes for omnibus supplemental aid packages and others on two resolutions named in Democratic scorecards—so any definitive inventory must note those limits in the available reporting [1] [4] [5].

1. What the Democratic scorecard lists: H.Res.771 and H.Res.793

An activist Democratic scorecard and accompanying summaries list H.Res.771, “Standing with Israel as it defends itself against the barbaric war launched by Hamas and other terrorists,” and H.Res.793, “Calling on Hamas to immediately release hostages taken during October 2023 attack on Israel,” as items connected to Representative Crockett’s record; those entries indicate she supported or was associated with those resolutions, which, by title, express congressional condemnation of Hamas’s October 7 attack and call for hostage releases, though the scorecard listing does not provide the resolutions’ full operative text or whether she was the primary sponsor [1].

2. Floor votes on supplemental aid packages and what they contained

Multiple outlet summaries and Crockett’s own explanations tie her record to large supplemental aid packages that bundled funding for Israel alongside other items—Ukraine, Taiwan, Haiti, and humanitarian assistance for Gaza—rather than to narrow, Israel‑only bills; Crockett has defended votes for such omnibus packages as leverage to secure aid for Gaza and other priorities and has said she opposed bills that would have been Israel‑only [6] [7] [4]. Advocacy trackers and critics single out votes on specific numbered House bills—cited in some reports as H.R.8034 (an Israel security supplemental appropriations act), H.R.6126 (a standalone Israel aid bill), H.R.7217, and H.R.8369—but the provided sources vary in framing and do not include the statutory language to enumerate line‑by‑line provisions [5].

3. Crockett’s public statements and framing of her votes

In official statements and press releases, Crockett framed certain Republican‑led Israel aid packages as “partisan” when they included unrelated spending cuts, saying she voted against such standalone Republican measures (her November 2, 2023 statement) while supporting omnibus supplements that included Gaza and other aid; she also issued a statement welcoming a Biden‑administered ceasefire and hostage‑release agreement and urged parties to accept its terms [3] [2]. These public remarks establish her stated policy rationale—opposing one‑off, partisan Israel funding while supporting bundled packages that include humanitarian aid—but they do not themselves create statutory provisions [2] [3].

4. Where reporting diverges and what’s missing

Progressive watchdogs and editorial outlets portray Crockett’s record as materially enabling billions in military aid to Israel by voting for supplemental bills that critics say funded offensive munitions and Iron Dome replenishment; Crockett and defenders respond that the supplemental bills provided “defensive” assistance and humanitarian funding for Gaza, and that Democrats used leverage to secure that humanitarian language [5] [4] [7]. The provided sources do not include the full text, sponsor lists, or Congressional Research Service summaries that would definitively show which specific bills she introduced, the exact authorized dollar amounts by purpose, or the precise restrictions and reporting requirements included in those measures [1] [5].

5. Bottom line and reporting limitation

Based on the documents supplied, the clearest named items tied to Crockett are the two House resolutions noted on a Democratic scorecard (H.Res.771 and H.Res.793) and her votes and public statements regarding omnibus supplemental appropriations that included Israel funding plus Gaza and other aid; precise bill introductions, sponsorship details, and full provisions for the various H.R. numbers cited in advocacy reporting are not present in the provided sources, so a conclusive, line‑by‑line catalogue of “bills she introduced and their key provisions” cannot be compiled from this material alone [1] [6] [5] [3]. To move from advocacy summaries and statements to a firm legal accounting would require the actual Congressional bill texts, sponsor information, and committee reports not included here.

Want to dive deeper?
Which specific votes did Jasmine Crockett cast on the April 2024 foreign aid supplemental and what were the bill’s line‑item allocations?
What are the full texts and sponsor lists for H.Res.771 and H.Res.793 and who officially introduced them in the House?
How have progressive and conservative watchdog groups respectively documented Representative Crockett’s voting record on Israel‑related appropriations and what evidence do they cite?