What proportion of Jasmine Crockett's campaign funding comes from corporate vs. individual donors?
Executive summary
Federal filings and watchdog databases show Jasmine Crockett raised millions for her House and Senate bids but the compiled sources here do not provide a single, consistent breakdown that states “X% corporate vs. Y% individual” for her overall campaign receipts; OpenSecrets and the FEC are cited as the authoritative data sources for such breakdowns [1] [2]. Reporting notes Crockett raised roughly $2.7 million from July–September and had about $4.6 million on hand at the end of that reporting period, but those figures do not by themselves reveal the corporate vs. individual share [3] [4].
1. What the official records can tell you — and what they don’t (FEC, OpenSecrets)
The Federal Election Commission houses the raw filings for Crockett’s authorized committees and is the primary source for itemized receipts and summary totals; OpenSecrets aggregates and classifies that FEC data into categories like “source of funds” but the snapshot summaries referenced here note that cycle-end totals and categorizations are updated on different schedules and may lag detailed itemization [1] [2]. Available sources do not provide a single quoted percentage split of “corporate vs. individual” for Crockett’s fundraising in the materials supplied here; they point you to the FEC/OpenSecrets data where that calculation can be generated [1] [2].
2. Recent fundraising totals journalists have reported
News outlets covering Crockett’s Senate launch and House accounts report concrete dollar totals for recent filing periods: Crockett raised about $2.7 million for her House campaign fund from July through September and ended that reporting month with roughly $4.6 million cash on hand, figures cited by PBS, AP-affiliated outlets and local TV reporting [3] [4] [5]. These totals are useful context for scale but are not broken down into corporate PAC, corporate, individual, or small-dollar buckets in the cited pieces [3] [4].
3. Media narratives and partisan claims about donor composition
Conservative outlets and partisan-leaning sites have pushed narratives that Crockett’s donor base shifted from small-dollar grassroots to corporate, crypto and foreign-backed money; examples include a March 2025 piece asserting she accepted corporate PAC dollars and alleging crypto-linked super PAC backing, and later conservative coverage repeating claims about corporate and crypto funding sources [6] [7]. Those pieces make strong assertions about donors (crypto moguls, corporations, foreign governments) but the available reporting here does not link those claims directly to specific, verifiable percentage breakdowns from FEC/OpenSecrets summaries in the sources provided [6] [7].
4. How to get the exact corporate vs. individual split (methodology)
To produce the precise corporate-vs-individual proportion you must query the FEC candidate page for Jasmine Crockett’s committees to download itemized receipts and the “contributions by contributor type” tables, or use OpenSecrets’ “Source of Funds” breakdown for the relevant election cycle; the FEC site provides receipts and contribution classifications while OpenSecrets will have already categorized donors into PACs, corporations, individuals, etc. The FEC candidate page is cited here as the authoritative dataset and OpenSecrets as an analyzed presentation of that data [1] [2]. Available sources do not include the computed percentage requested.
5. Conflicting signals and why percent figures can vary
Even when you get raw data, different vendors classify donations differently: family members and employment-affiliated giving can be attributed to an employer, PACs vs. corporate treasury sources may be recorded separately, and independent expenditures by outside groups are tracked apart from candidate receipts — all factors noted in OpenSecrets’ methodological notes and FEC guidance [2] [1]. That explains why media accounts emphasize different narratives (small-dollar roots vs. corporate/crypto backing) depending on which slices of data they highlight [2] [6].
6. What I can and cannot conclude from the supplied reporting
The supplied reporting shows Crockett is a substantial fundraiser with multi-million-dollar cash-on-hand figures reported in late 2025, and partisan outlets accuse her of taking corporate, crypto and foreign-linked money [3] [4] [6] [7]. However, available sources do not state a single, verified percentage split of “corporate vs. individual” campaign funding for Crockett; to answer your original question precisely you must consult the FEC candidate page or OpenSecrets “Source of Funds” breakdown for the specific cycle and compute (or read) the percentage there [1] [2].
If you want, I can extract and compute that percentage from FEC/OpenSecrets filings now — tell me which cycle or reporting end date you want (e.g., 2023–24 cycle, or filings through Sept. 30, 2025) and I will pull the numbers cited in these databases and calculate the corporate vs. individual share as reported by those sources [1] [2].