Jasmine crockett win loss

1. Career arc in brief — from Texas House to U.S. House

Jasmine Crockett began public elective office at the state level, winning the Texas House District 100 general election in November 2020, according to Ballotpedia ^[3]. She then ran for and won the open U.S. House seat for Texas’ 30th Congressional District in 2022 to succeed Eddie Bernice Johnson, a result reported at the time by local outlets ^[5]. GovTrack lists her as the representative for TX-30 for the 2023–2026 term ^[4].

2. 2024 re‑election — who reported the win and when

Crockett’s 2024 re‑election was reported by multiple local and national outlets. FOX4 Dallas‑Fort Worth declared she had been re‑elected to Texas’ 30th Congressional District on Nov. 6, 2024 ^[2]. The Associated Press was cited by WDBJ7 as having declared her the winner at 8:06 p.m. on election night ^[6]. The Dallas Morning News also ran coverage noting her re‑election and her earlier 2022 election to the seat ^[1].

3. Opponents and contest context

Ballotpedia’s coverage of the 2024 TX‑30 contest lists a field of general‑election opponents and notes that Crockett defeated multiple challengers in the 2024 cycle; it also documents that she defeated Jarred Davis in the March 5, 2024 Democratic primary ^[7]. Ballotpedia’s district page records that in the general election she defeated named opponents including James Rodgers, Zachariah Manning, Phil Gray, and Debbie Walker in prior coverage of the district races ^[8]. Local reporting framed her win within a reliably Democratic district ^[8].

4. Vote reporting and authoritative declarations

The Associated Press’ declaration of Crockett’s win on election night is the standard form of authoritative result reporting cited in local coverage ^[6]. News organizations such as FOX4 and the Dallas Morning News followed with published stories confirming her re‑election ^{[2] [1]}.

5. Campaign finance and ethics allegations cited by commentators

Conservative outlets and commentators have raised questions about Crockett’s campaign expenditures and ethics. For example, Townhall’s piece and linked reporting assert FEC filings show substantial spending on hotels, transportation and security and reference prior complaints and coverage in other outlets ^[9]. The Dallas Morning News and AP pieces reporting election outcomes do not focus on those spending allegations in their election result articles ^{[1] [6]}. Available sources do not mention specific adjudications or FEC rulings resolving those spending claims in the election‑coverage stories ^{[2] [1] [6] [9]}.

6. How media framing differs — local outlets vs. partisan commentary

Local news outlets (FOX4, Dallas Morning News, WDBJ7/AP) presented Crockett’s victories as standard election reporting: winner declared, biographical context, and local implications ^{[2] [1] [6]}. Partisan and opinion‑oriented outlets (for example, Townhall) highlighted alleged campaign spending and framed those items as ethics concerns ^[9]. Both perspectives are present in the reporting corpus; readers should note the difference between straight result reporting and partisan commentary when interpreting claims ^{[2] [1] [6] [9]}.

7. What the sources do not say

Available sources do not provide a comprehensive vote tally breakdown in this collection (precise percentages or county‑by‑county totals are not included here) nor do they include final FEC determinations or legal findings about the spending allegations referenced by Townhall ^{[2] [1] [6] [9]}. If you seek exact vote totals, certification documents, or any FEC enforcement actions, those items are not found in the current reporting set and would need to be checked directly with election authorities or FEC releases (not found in current reporting).

8. Bottom line for the original query “jasmine crockett win loss”

On the question of whether Crockett “won” or “lost”: authoritative outlets and election reporting in this source set show she won the 2022 U.S. House seat for TX‑30 and was re‑elected in 2024, with vote‑call declarations by AP and local media ^{[3] [6] [2] [1]}. Criticism about her spending appears in partisan commentary but is separate from the election outcome reporting and, in this collection, lacks follow‑up on regulatory findings ^[9].