Has Jasmine Crockett received endorsements or donations from pro-Israel or pro-Palestine groups?

1. Public denials and local reporting that push back on AIPAC claims

Crockett has explicitly told reporters and audiences that she has never been endorsed by AIPAC, and two contemporaneous news pieces covering her 2025–2026 Senate campaign reported and quoted that denial as part of rebutting social‑media attacks alleging pro‑Israel backing ^{[1] [2]}. Those pieces also framed the allegations as part of a larger “coordinated attack” over her Israel‑Gaza votes, signaling that the claim of an AIPAC endorsement circulated online but was disputed by the campaign and local outlets ^[2].

2. Watchdog and activist trackers: critical, not always neutral, records

Independent trackers and activist sites have weighed in with hostile or critical takes: Track AIPAC monitors donations and voting records and labeled Crockett as having a poor legislative record on Israel‑Palestine issues while using donations data to shame lawmakers it considers too proximate to the Israel lobby ^[6]. Conversely, the Reverse Canary Mission entry is an advocacy dossier that accuses Crockett of voting for large aid packages to Israel and of traveling on an American Israel Education Foundation trip—assertions offered as evidence of complicity rather than as neutral endorsements or documented donations ^[4]. Those sources have explicit agendas: Track AIPAC seeks to make AIPAC‑adjacent donations politically toxic ^[6], and Reverse Canary frames legislators as complicit in apartheid, which shapes how it presents votes and trips ^[4].

3. Campaign finance data exists but is not explicit in the provided snippets

OpenSecrets maintains a campaign finance summary for Crockett and explains that contributions attributed to organizations reflect PACs, employees or members rather than direct corporate gifts, but the snippet supplied does not enumerate which PACs or interest groups gave to Crockett in the 2024 cycle, so it cannot be used here to confirm pro‑Israel or pro‑Palestine PAC donations to her without consulting the full OpenSecrets record ^[3]. In short, the existence of a comprehensive finance profile is confirmed, but the provided excerpt does not identify donations from named pro‑Israel or pro‑Palestine organizations ^[3].

4. Votes and resolutions complicate the perception of endorsements

Crockett’s roll‑call votes and public positions have been catalogued by various organizations and scorecards, and those votes—such as support for certain foreign‑aid packages and for resolutions calling for de‑escalation—have been used by both critics and defenders to argue she is either too proximate to Israel or supportive of Palestinian cease‑fire demands ^{[4] [5]}. Those legislative actions explain why outside groups and trackers have an interest in labeling her record, but votes are not the same as endorsements or financial backing, and the provided sources do not tie a specific pro‑Israel or pro‑Palestine endorsement or donation directly to Crockett.

5. What the current reporting does—and does not—prove

Reporting compiled here proves that Crockett has publicly denied an AIPAC endorsement and that local outlets repeated that denial amid social‑media attacks ^{[1] [2]}; watchdogs and activist sites have criticized her voting record and flagged connections such as a reported AIEF trip and aid votes ^{[6] [4] [5]}; and a campaign‑finance profile exists on OpenSecrets though the provided snippet does not list specific donors ^[3]. None of the provided sources, however, offers an unambiguous record showing that a named pro‑Israel or pro‑Palestine organization officially endorsed her or made a documented donation to her campaign in the materials supplied here, and the available items include actors with clear advocacy aims that shape their characterizations ^{[6] [4]}.