How has jasmine crockett voted on health care legislation in congress?

1. Voting and sponsorship pattern: Democratic-aligned, legislative activity on health topics

Crockett’s congressional profile and her official member site show she has sponsored and cosponsored bills that include health coverage, access and performance measurement among their topics, indicating active legislative engagement with health policy rather than abstention from the subject ^{[1] [4] [5]}. GovTrack’s legislative profile and BillTrack50 list her as an active sponsor and cosponsor across issue areas including health care, and VoteSmart groups her “key votes” by issue — including a health and health care category — which signals that health votes are tracked for her but does not itself enumerate each roll call in the sources provided here ^{[2] [6] [7] [3]}.

2. Where public scorecards place her: generally left of center by advocacy measures

Independent and interest-group scorecards illustrate how different constituencies interpret Crockett’s record: Heritage Action (a conservative advocacy group) publishes a low alignment score for her across “key votes,” reflecting opposition to conservative priorities on many issues including likely health roll calls, while labor-aligned scorecards such as AFL‑CIO’s track her favorably on worker- and benefit-related measures — both of which are consistent with a Democratic voting pattern on social and economic policy including health matters ^{[8] [9] [10]}.

3. Caucus membership and ideology provide context for health votes

Crockett is listed as a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and has been described in press profiles as a progressive Democrat (though she sometimes resists labels), which helps explain a legislative orientation favoring expanded access and federal health protections — an orientation that usually translates into yes votes for expansions of coverage and opposition to cuts — but the specific votes for each bill are not detailed in the snippets provided ^[11].

4. What the available sources do not show: the missing roll-call ledger

The reporting assembled here includes links and references to official repositories (Congress.gov, GovTrack, VoteSmart) and to her office’s “Votes and Legislation” page, but none of the provided snippets present a complete, item‑by‑item roll‑call history on major health bills such as ACA amendments, Medicare policy changes, or reconciliation packages; therefore it is not possible from these sources alone to produce a definitive list of every floor vote Crockett cast on specific health care bills without consulting the full roll‑call entries on Congress.gov or VoteSmart’s detailed vote pages ^{[1] [3] [4] [2]}.

5. How to verify specifics and why that matters

To verify how Crockett voted on any particular health care proposal — for example Medicaid funding changes, prescription drug legislation, or coverage expansions — the authoritative path is to inspect the roll‑call record for that bill on Congress.gov or one of the nonpartisan trackers (GovTrack, VoteSmart) which maintain searchable vote histories by member and issue; the provided sources explicitly point to those services as where her votes and bills are catalogued ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Alternative viewpoints exist in the form of advocacy scorecards (Heritage Action vs. AFL‑CIO) that interpret the same votes through different political lenses, so readers should consult raw roll-call data to form an independent judgment ^{[8] [9]}.

6. Bottom line

Based on her sponsorship activity, caucus affiliation and the partisan scorecards cited by public trackers, Jasmine Crockett’s health‑care voting behavior aligns with mainstream Democratic and progressive priorities — supporting broader access and worker protections and opposing conservative roll‑call priorities — but a complete, bill‑by‑bill roll‑call accounting is not present in the supplied material and requires consulting the detailed vote records on Congress.gov, GovTrack or VoteSmart ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.