Which Israel-related bills has Jasmine Crockett sponsored or co-sponsored?

Checked on December 12, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Representative Jasmine Crockett has supported and opposed multiple Israel-related measures since taking office; available sources document her votes on high-profile aid and security packages (she voted against the November 2, 2023 GOP package and for later supplemental bills) and show she has sponsored or cosponsored several Israel/Palestine resolutions calling for cease-fires, hostage releases, and condemnations (H.Res.786 among them) [1] [2] [3] [4]. Public trackers and advocacy organizations characterize her record as mixed: criticized by some progressive, Palestinian-rights groups for supporting major aid packages while also backing cease-fire and diplomatic measures [4] [5].

1. A lawmaker with split signals: votes vs. resolutions

Crockett’s public statements and roll-call votes show a split approach: she formally opposed the November 2, 2023 House Republican “Israel aid package” and called it “partisan, inadequate, and fiscally irresponsible,” saying “I vote NO on this bill,” in a campaign office press release [1]. At the same time, outside summaries and watchdog sites report she voted yea on other high-dollar Israel supplemental appropriations—claims that appear in advocacy reporting accusing her of backing large aid bills during the Gaza war [5] [4]. Available sources do not provide a complete roll-call list for every Israel-related bill she sponsored or cosponsored; they focus on key votes and selected resolutions [1] [2] [3].

2. Resolutions she’s associated with: cease-fire, hostage calls, and condemnations

Issue trackers and advocacy pages list specific House resolutions tied to Crockett’s record. AJP Action’s Democratic scorecard attributes H.Res.786—“Calling for an immediate deescalation and cease-fire in Israel and occupied Palestine”—to her record, and also lists other resolutions on hostages and condemnations relevant to the conflict (H.Res.793, H.Res.1143, H.Res.845) [3]. Crockett’s office issued public statements praising diplomatic efforts like the January 18, 2025 Israel-Hamas ceasefire and hostage release deal, signaling support for negotiated pauses and releases [2]. These sources show she has publicly embraced cease-fire language and hostage-release diplomacy [3] [2].

3. High-profile aid bills: opposition, but also reported yea votes

Crockett’s press release records a clear NO on the November 2, 2023 GOP-led aid package, criticizing it as a vehicle for partisan spending cuts [1]. However, outside reporting and watchdog summaries claim she later voted in favor of other large supplemental packages providing billions to Israel [5] [4]. For example, advocacy reporting accuses her of voting yea on multibillion-dollar supplemental appropriations during the Gaza war; those characterizations are used by critics to argue her public rhetoric on cease-fires conflicted with votes to fund Israel’s military operations [5] [4]. Exact bill numbers and full sponsorship lists are not consistently provided in the available sources; they emphasize selected votes and critiques rather than a comprehensive sponsorship ledger [5] [4].

4. How advocacy groups and media frame her record

Progressive and Palestinian-rights organizations give Crockett “low marks” on Israel–Palestine issue scorecards and describe her as having “a poor legislative record on Israel–Palestine issues,” while other outlets note she has supported Israel after October 7, 2023 [4]. Reverse Canary Mission-like reporting frames her as complicit with aid flows, citing specific votes and bills as evidence [5]. Conversely, her own office frames certain votes as protecting constituents from partisan budget tricks and promotes diplomatic solutions like the cease-fire deal [1] [2]. These opposing framings reflect differing agendas: advocacy groups prioritize immediate humanitarian and cease-fire demands, while her office emphasizes legislative process and political caution [5] [1].

5. What’s missing and how to pursue clarity

Available sources do not provide a single, complete list of every Israel-related bill Crockett has sponsored or cosponsored; they instead offer a mix of press releases, advocacy scorecards, and reporting that highlight key votes and select resolutions [1] [3] [5]. For a definitive sponsorship list, consult the official congressional sponsorship database (Congress.gov) or Crockett’s congressional office legislative tracker—sources not included in the current reporting. Until those primary legislative records are checked, assessments must rely on the partial, sometimes partisan, summaries in the sources above [5] [3] [1].

Summary judgement: Crockett’s publicly documented actions show she has both supported cease-fire and diplomatic resolutions and been implicated by critics in votes for large Israel aid bills; the available sources present competing narratives—her office’s explanation of process and diplomacy [1] [2] versus advocacy outlets’ criticism of her votes as enabling continued military funding [5] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
Which congressional committees has Jasmine Crockett served on and how do they influence Israel-related legislation?
Has Jasmine Crockett voted on major Israel-related bills and how did she vote?
What public statements has Jasmine Crockett made about U.S. policy toward Israel and Gaza in 2023–2025?
Which Israel-related amendments or funding measures has Jasmine Crockett introduced or supported in the House?
How do Jasmine Crockett’s positions on Israel compare to other progressive members of Congress?