How do Jasmine Crockett’s Israel votes compare with other House Democrats?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Jasmine Crockett has cast a mix of votes on Israel-related measures: she voted for several post‑Oct. 7 aid and security measures and condemned attacks on Israel, but she also opposed at least one standalone Republican Israel aid package and has made public calls for de‑escalation and a ceasefire [1] [2] [3]. Outside groups rate her inconsistently—some progressive and Palestinian‑rights organizations give her low marks for pro‑Israel votes while others such as Peace Action list alignment on some peace priorities [4] [5] [6].
1. The basic pattern: mixed yeses, strategic noes
Crockett’s roll‑call footprint shows she voted “yes” on multiple pro‑Israel security and condemnation resolutions after October 7, 2023, and supported funding measures at times, while publicly criticizing specific Republican bills and voting “no” on at least one standalone Israel aid package she called “partisan, inadequate, and fiscally irresponsible” [1] [3] [2]. This produces a record that is neither uniformly pro‑aid nor uniformly oppositional.
2. How advocates and watchdogs interpret that pattern
Progressive and Palestinian‑rights groups have criticized Crockett’s record, describing it as “poor” on Israel‑Palestine issues and pointing to yea votes on major aid bills and resolutions as evidence she “enabled” continued military support for Israel [4] [5]. By contrast, groups that track anti‑war or diplomacy‑oriented positions note she has supported ceasefire language and de‑escalation resolutions in some instances [3] [6]. Sources therefore frame Crockett’s record differently depending on their policy lens [4] [5] [6].
3. How Crockett explains her votes
Crockett’s own office and public statements stress she rejected specific Republican proposals and that some “yes” votes were tactical to secure broader outcomes — for example, arguing she voted to enable aid delivery to Palestinians when packages were bundled by Republican leadership [2] [7]. Her January 2025 statement on the Israel‑Hamas ceasefire deal further signals she supported that diplomatic outcome [8]. These explanations are cited in Crockett’s constituent communications and social posts [2] [8] [7].
4. Comparison with “other House Democrats”: available reporting limits direct ranking
Available sources do not provide a systematic, side‑by‑side numerical comparison of Crockett and every House Democrat on each Israel vote; reporting notes she supported Israel‑related measures like many Democrats but also drew criticism from the left for some yea votes [1] [4]. Some outlets describe her as part of mainstream Democratic votes supporting Israel post‑October 7 while simultaneously noting she is in the Congressional Progressive Caucus—creating tension between caucus membership and her votes [4] [1].
5. Where the disagreements concentrate
Critics focus on Crockett’s yes votes on high‑dollar aid packages and certain condemnations (cited as evidence she backed sustained military support), while defenders highlight her no votes on Republican‑crafted bills, public calls for ceasefires, and claims that she voted tactically to secure humanitarian assistance to Palestinians when votes were linked [5] [2] [7] [8]. Each side uses different votes as the key evidence.
6. Agenda and framing: why coverage diverges
Progressive and Palestine‑rights sites frame votes through human‑rights and anti‑occupation lenses and therefore treat any support for large Israeli aid as complicity [5]. More mainstream profiles (Britannica, official statements) emphasize support for Israel after October 7 and diplomatic engagement, framing her as broadly aligned with Democratic foreign‑policy moves [1] [2]. Those differing missions explain why the same roll calls produce opposite conclusions [5] [1].
7. What’s missing from current reporting
Detailed, vote‑by‑vote tables comparing Crockett with the full House Democratic caucus on each Israel‑related measure are not present in the supplied results; available sources do not mention a comprehensive comparative dataset (not found in current reporting). Nor do sourced items here provide exhaustive context on amendment texts or procedural reasons for each vote beyond Crockett’s statements and advocacy group summaries [2] [5].
8. Bottom line for readers
Crockett’s record is nuanced: she has supported key post‑October 7 Israel measures that many House Democrats backed while also voting against at least one Republican aid package and publicly supporting ceasefire diplomacy—results that please neither some progressives nor pro‑Israel advocates [1] [2] [3]. Readers who want a precise comparative ranking should consult complete roll‑call datasets or nonpartisan vote trackers; those are not contained in the sources provided here (not found in current reporting).