Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are Jasmine Crockett's key votes on foreign aid to Israel since 2023?
Executive summary
Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett voted “No” on the House procedural and standalone Israel emergency supplemental measures in November 2023, publicly calling one package “partisan, inadequate, and fiscally irresponsible” [1] [2]. Available sources also report she has voted in favor of some Israel-related measures after October 7, 2023, but specifics and a full roll‑call list for every foreign‑aid vote since 2023 are not all present in the provided materials [3] [4].
1. November 2023: a clear “No” on the standalone supplemental — political and fiscal objections
On November 1–2, 2023, Crockett cast recorded “Nay” votes related to House consideration of H.R. 6126 (the Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024) and the rule/consideration motions tied to that package; C‑SPAN’s roll calls list her as “No” (House Vote 564/565) and her congressional press release frames the November vote as a rejection of a partisan package that attached spending cuts to emergency aid [2] [1]. In her statement she argued the bill was inadequate and warned against using emergency aid to push unrelated partisan cuts [1].
2. Conflicting portrayals in outside trackers — “mixed record” claims
Advocacy and tracking sites depict Crockett’s record as mixed. One summary alleges she voted “yea” on larger supplemental measures later in 2023/2024 (citing H.R. 8034 on October 25, 2023, and other bills), portraying her as having supported major Israel aid packages despite rejecting the November 2023 standalone bill [3]. That site frames those votes in strongly critical terms and links them to absence of pro‑Israel PAC contributions, a point meant to highlight perceived contradiction between funding sources and votes [3]. Note: the claim set on that site is advocacy‑oriented and contains charged language; the underlying roll‑call citations are not reproduced in the sources you supplied beyond the general claim [3].
3. Congressional compilations show many Israel‑related votes since Oct. 7, 2023 — but not per‑member detail here
The Congressional Research Service and Congress.gov maintain inventories of Israel‑ and Gaza‑related legislation and emergency assistance after October 7, 2023, noting that Congress continued to provide emergency supplemental military assistance and other measures [5] [6]. Those CRS/Congress.gov overviews document the landscape of bills and resolutions but the specific member‑by‑member roll calls for each later vote are not contained in the materials you provided; therefore a complete, sourced listing of every Crockett vote on every Israel foreign‑aid measure since 2023 is not available in the current set of documents [5] [6].
4. Votes and resolutions beyond appropriations — show of solidarity vs. aid specifics
Trackers (AJP Action, for example) list Crockett’s sponsorship or votes on several House resolutions relating to the October 7 attacks — H.Res.771, H.Res.793, H.Res.798, H.Res.845 and similar — which are primarily statements of stance (condemnations, calls for hostage release, campus‑related condemnations) rather than appropriations of funds [7]. These types of measures indicate positions on the conflict’s political questions even if they don’t directly authorize aid; the sources you provided list such resolutions as part of her voting record but do not give complete roll‑call data for each in this packet [7].
5. Public statements: balancing humanitarian concern and support for negotiated ceasefire
Crockett’s office issued statements emphasizing a desire for comprehensive packages that aid both Israel and Ukraine while protecting civilians in Gaza, and later praised the January 2025 ceasefire/hostage deal as a positive step toward ending violence and delivering aid to Palestinian civilians [1] [8] [9]. These statements show she frames votes through a lens of fiscal responsibility and humanitarian concern; the public messaging is explicitly quoted in her press materials [1] [8].
6. What we can confidently say and what remains unconfirmed in these sources
Confident: she voted “No” on the November 2023 House consideration/standalone Israel supplemental and publicly explained that “No” as rejection of a partisan, inadequate package that mixed emergency aid with cuts [2] [1]. Less certain from the supplied material: a comprehensive, itemized list of every roll‑call on foreign aid to Israel she cast from 2023 through 2025 (the CRS and Congress.gov compilations describe the bills and the context but the provided extracts do not enumerate all Crockett roll calls) [5] [6]. Advocacy sites assert she later voted “Yes” on other large aid packages, but those claims in your packet are presented without full roll‑call citations here [3].
7. How to get a complete, verifiable roll‑call list (next steps)
To assemble an authoritative, item‑by‑item list: [10] consult Congress.gov member‑specific roll calls for each bill listed in the CRS/CRS‑product tables (H.R.6126, H.R.8034, H.R.7217, H.R.8369, etc.), [11] cross‑check with the House Clerk/C‑SPAN roll‑call archives for each vote date, and [12] compare with Crockett’s official press releases for her public explanations [2] [5] [1]. The materials you provided point to where those records live but do not include a complete, cited roll‑call ledger for every Israel foreign‑aid vote since 2023 [5] [2] [1].
Limitations: This analysis uses only the sources you supplied; claims outside those documents are “not found in current reporting” here [3] [5].