Which specific Palestine-related progressive bills has Rep. Jasmine Crockett cosponsored or introduced?
Executive summary
Rep. Jasmine Crockett has publicly supported at least one Palestine-related progressive measure — she cosponsored or is listed as supporting H.Res.786, “Calling for an immediate deescalation and cease-fire in Israel and occupied Palestine,” according to a Democratic scorecard entry [1]. Her broader record on Israel–Palestine mixes ceasefire statements and votes tied to larger aid packages; critics and scorecards characterize her overall record as not consistently aligned with the most vocal Palestinian-rights progressives [2] [3].
1. The clear, named progressive bill she’s tied to: H.Res.786
The most specific Palestine-related progressive item in the provided material is H.Res.786 — “Calling for an immediate deescalation and cease-fire in Israel and occupied Palestine” — which appears on a Democratic scorecard listing of Rep. Crockett’s activity [1]. That listing treats H.Res.786 as a distinct, pro-ceasefire resolution Crockett is associated with [1].
2. Public statements that echo the resolution’s aims
Crockett’s official statement welcoming the Israel–Hamas ceasefire and hostage-release agreement reiterates a call to end the fighting and to provide aid to Palestinian civilians, language consistent with H.Res.786’s deescalation emphasis [4]. Local coverage of that statement likewise quotes her praise for the ceasefire as “a crucial step toward ending the violence in Gaza” and delivering aid to Palestinian civilians [5].
3. Where her record is described as mixed or criticized
Independent summaries and Wikipedia note that Crockett’s voting record on Israel–Palestine issues has drawn criticism from some progressive and Palestinian-rights advocacy organizations, which give her low scores and describe her legislative record as poor on these issues [2]. An advocacy-oriented profile accuses her of supporting pro-Israel resolutions and aid measures during the Israel–Hamas war and characterizes her as distancing herself from the “progressive” label on these votes [2].
4. Activist and watch-group portrayals: tougher scrutiny
At least one activist compilation portrays Crockett more harshly, alleging she voted for large aid packages to Israel and describing her as “complicit in apartheid,” while noting she criticized some standalone Israel-aid bills as “partisan, inadequate, and fiscally irresponsible.” That source also asserts absences on particular votes and contends her words in favor of a ceasefire did not always match her votes on certain aid measures [3]. The source mixes direct vote claims with interpretive, critical framing [3].
5. Votes against a specific Republican-crafted aid bill — context, not full alignment
Crockett publicly said she voted against a November 2023 Republican-led Israel aid package because it attached contentious spending cuts, calling that specific package “partisan, inadequate, and fiscally irresponsible” [6]. That statement reflects opposition to that particular bill’s structure, while not alone proving an across‑the‑board progressive voting pattern on all Israel–Palestine legislation [6].
6. What the available sources do not supply
Available sources do not provide a full roll-call list in this packet showing every bill Crockett has sponsored or cosponsored on Palestine-related topics; beyond H.Res.786 and public statements, the materials do not list a set of named progressive Palestine bills she has introduced herself (not found in current reporting). For specifics such as bill numbers she sponsored or a complete cosponsorship list, the available reporting here is incomplete [1] [4] [6].
7. Competing viewpoints and implicit agendas in the sources
Official Crockett releases (her office and local press) frame her as a pro-ceasefire lawmaker praising ceasefire diplomacy [4] [5]. Advocacy and watchdog sources present the opposite frame: that she has voted for aid packages and pro-Israel measures and deserves criticism from Palestinian-rights progressives [3] [2]. Each source carries an implicit agenda — campaign or office statements aim to highlight humanitarian and diplomatic posture [4], while watchdog and activist outlets prioritize accountability to a specific policy standard and emphasize alleged contradictions [3] [2]. Readers should weigh both frames against concrete bill texts and roll-call votes, which are not fully reproduced in the current collection [2].
8. Bottom line for the question asked
From the materials provided, the only explicitly named Palestine-related progressive resolution directly tied to Crockett is H.Res.786, the immediate deescalation/ceasefire resolution [1]. Other materials show public ceasefire statements and contested vote patterns that opponents use to argue she has not consistently backed the full suite of Palestine-centered progressive demands [4] [6] [3] [2]. For a comprehensive, verified list of every Palestine-related bill she has sponsored or cosponsored, consult official congressional records or Crockett’s congressional cosponsor list; that detailed roll-call or sponsorship data is not included in the supplied sources (not found in current reporting).