What progressive bills has Jasmine Crockett supported related to Palestine?
Executive summary
Representative Jasmine Crockett has publicly called for a ceasefire and praised a January 2025 Israel‑Hamas ceasefire and hostage‑release deal, and her record shows a mix of statements and votes that some progressive and Palestinian‑rights groups criticize as insufficiently pro‑Palestine [1] [2]. Advocacy scorecards list support for H.Res.786 (calling for de‑escalation and a ceasefire) but also show votes and positions—such as backing several pro‑Israel resolutions and aid measures—that have drawn rebuke from progressive organizations [3] [2].
1. A ceasefire advocate in public statements — praise for the 2025 deal
Crockett issued an explicit statement welcoming the Israel‑Hamas ceasefire and hostage release agreement in January 2025, calling it “a great step towards halting the fighting in Gaza” and urging a move toward “permanent, lasting peace” while acknowledging civilian suffering on both sides [1] [4].
2. Voting and resolution record — mixed signals on Palestine policy
Public records and summaries show Crockett supported H.Res.786 — “Calling for an immediate deescalation and cease‑fire in Israel and occupied Palestine” — a move aligned with progressive, ceasefire‑oriented demands [3]. At the same time, reporting and her compiled voting record note that she supported several pro‑Israel resolutions and aid measures during the Israel‑Hamas war, a pattern that has attracted criticism from progressive and Palestinian‑rights groups [2].
3. How progressive groups and watchdogs rate her — criticism and nuance
Progressive and Palestine‑rights organizations give Crockett low marks on Israel‑Palestine issues. Sources say these groups describe her record as “poor” on the issue and have urged stronger calls for a ceasefire, even while some outlets note she rejects the “progressive” label and frames positions as “common sense” [2]. Advocacy sites list H.Res.786 under her record but also cite other resolutions [3].
4. Arguments from critics — votes that undermine ceasefire claims
Critiques from Palestinian‑rights and watchdog sites argue Crockett’s rhetoric on questioning continued U.S. funding for Israel is undermined by votes they interpret as supporting Israeli security measures and aid packages; one source alleges she was absent for a key Democratic vote to cut aid and that she voted for aid bills totaling billions, framing this as enabling continued military operations [5]. That source also highlights she voted “yea” on H.Res.798, which condemned campus use of the slogan “from the river to the sea,” and frames such votes as weaponizing antisemitism to counter Palestinian solidarity [5].
5. Her stated rationale and selective opposition to specific bills
Crockett publicly voted against a November 2, 2023 House Israel aid package framed as “partisan, inadequate, and fiscally irresponsible,” criticizing Republican amendments that inserted unrelated spending cuts; she described that bill as a “Trojan Horse” and said she voted NO on it [6]. That statement shows she distinguishes between opposing partisan maneuvers and opposing all aid to Israel [6].
6. The political context — why her record appears inconsistent
Multiple sources show Crockett operates in a political space where statements for ceasefire and humanitarian relief coexist with votes on complex aid packages and pro‑Israel resolutions; advocacy scorecards and media summaries emphasize the resulting tension and low marks from progressive organizations while her office emphasizes ceasefire diplomacy and humanitarian concerns [3] [2] [1].
7. What available sources do not mention
Available sources do not mention Crockett sponsoring specific standalone progressive bills explicitly framed as “pro‑Palestine” (for example, bills to condition or halt aid to Israel, or legislation recognizing Palestinian rights beyond calling for de‑escalation) during the period covered in these documents. They also do not provide her full roll‑call history on every Middle East funding vote within these excerpts (not found in current reporting).
8. Bottom line for readers evaluating her record
The public record in these sources shows Crockett has publicly called for ceasefire and praised negotiated deals [1] [4], supported H.Res.786 calling for de‑escalation [3], and yet has a voting pattern and ratings described by watchdogs as including support for pro‑Israel measures that draw progressive criticism [2] [5]. Readers should weigh her public statements and selective votes (e.g., opposing a partisan aid package) against the critique from Palestinian‑rights groups that say her legislative record falls short of more robust pro‑Palestine policy changes [6] [5].