Has jasmine crockett received campaign contributions from pro-israel political action committees?

1. The money question, answer given by OpenSecrets as reported

A public-facing claim repeated in activist reporting is that OpenSecrets’ data show Crockett received no donations from explicitly pro‑Israel PACs or individuals during the 2022–2024 election cycles, a point used to argue she is an exception among House Democrats ^[1]. The OpenSecrets member profile and contributors pages for Crockett are listed among the sources provided, which is the primary data aggregator cited for that zero‑contribution claim ^{[6] [7]}.

2. Endorsements and identity: AIPAC and the nuance of “pro‑Israel” labels

Crockett has publicly and repeatedly denied an AIPAC endorsement, and multiple outlet accounts relay her clarification that she was never backed by the pro‑Israel lobbying group AIPAC—an important distinction because AIPAC endorsement is often treated as shorthand for being pro‑Israel in fundraising terms ^{[2] [3]}. But “pro‑Israel PAC” is not a single, universally defined category; reporting and advocacy groups sometimes classify donors differently, which complicates categorical statements about “pro‑Israel” funding unless one cites the specific donor list and classification methodology ^{[6] [7]}.

3. Critics focus on votes; donors on different lists

Much of the controversy around Crockett centers on her roll‑call votes supporting major supplemental aid packages that included funds for Israel—votes that critics say amount to de facto support regardless of donor relationships ^{[1] [5]}. Media coverage and activist writeups contrast Crockett’s voting record with the claim that she did not take pro‑Israel PAC money, implying that legislative actions and financial ties are separate lines of accountability in this debate ^{[1] [2]}.

4. Complicating reporting: she has taken PAC money, but not necessarily from pro‑Israel PACs

Independent reporting has also documented that Crockett accepted substantial PAC contributions overall—reports cite more than $370,000 from PACs or similar entities across various cycles—though these pieces do not assert those PACs were pro‑Israel in orientation ^[4]. OpenSecrets’ contributor and summary pages (provided among the sources) are the right places to inspect granular donor names and PAC affiliations to determine whether any donors meet an agreed definition of “pro‑Israel” ^{[6] [7]}.

5. What the sources do and do not prove

The claim that Crockett has received no pro‑Israel PAC contributions rests on OpenSecrets data as cited by Reverse Canary Mission, and mainstream outlets confirm she has not been AIPAC‑endorsed ^{[1] [2] [3]}. However, the materials provided do not include a downloaded, line‑by‑line OpenSecrets donor list or a third‑party audit that defines which PACs were classified as “pro‑Israel,” so independent verification beyond the cited summaries is not present in these sources ^{[6] [7]}. Where opponents attack her record they mostly point to votes and policy positions, not documented funding from explicitly pro‑Israel PACs ^{[1] [5]}.

6. Bottom line and reporting caveats

Based on the reporting available here, the direct answer is: published summaries cited in activist and news reporting say Jasmine Crockett did not receive donations from pro‑Israel PACs or individuals in the 2022–2024 cycles and she has not been endorsed by AIPAC ^{[1] [2] [3]}. At the same time, she has accepted PAC funding in general ^[4], and critics highlight votes that benefitted Israel as the substantive issue regardless of donor lists ^{[1] [5]}. The conclusion is contingent on the classification choices used by OpenSecrets and the reporting outlets; a definitive, independently auditable list would require downloading and reviewing the detailed FEC/OpenSecrets contribution records referenced on those pages ^{[6] [7]}.