Has jasmine crockett received campaign donations from pro-israel or pro-palestine groups?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available sources show reporting and trackers that document donations to members of Congress from pro‑Israel groups and note Jasmine Crockett’s mixed record on Israel–Palestine votes, but they do not provide a single definitive ledger listing every pro‑Israel or pro‑Palestine donation to her campaign (Track AIPAC and OpenSecrets are cited for donation tracking; Track AIPAC characterizes her record as “poor” on Israel‑Palestine) [1][2]. Multiple advocacy outlets criticize her votes and fundraising ties from different angles; none of the supplied items show a clear, uncontested total of donations from explicitly pro‑Palestine groups [3][1][2].
1. What the trackers say: pro‑Israel spending is being logged, and Crockett appears in those profiles
Track AIPAC (also called AIPAC Tracker) and related projects aim to aggregate donations from AIPAC, J Street, DMFI and other groups associated with the pro‑Israel lobby; those profiles include Congressional donation data and voting records and explicitly include a profile on Representative Jasmine Crockett, stating she “has a poor legislative record on Israel‑Palestine issues” [1]. Independent summaries of Track AIPAC’s profiles note it lists donations tied to pro‑Israel groups and connects them to members’ voting records — Crockett is among the listed members [4][5].
2. What federal filing aggregators show: OpenSecrets is the standard source for campaign finance summaries
OpenSecrets hosts a campaign finance summary page for Jasmine Crockett; it is the repository usually used by trackers to identify PAC and individual contributions tied to organizations (OpenSecrets notes that sometimes “the organizations themselves did not donate” but that PACs, employees, or affiliated individuals did) [2]. The supplied OpenSecrets snippet confirms the dataset exists for Crockett but does not in these excerpts list specific line items that identify which contributions came from pro‑Israel or pro‑Palestine entities in aggregate [2].
3. Critical advocacy voices: accusations of hypocrisy and complicit votes
Progressive and Palestine‑supporting groups have criticized Crockett for votes they view as supporting Israeli security assistance despite her rhetoric calling for ceasefires; Reverse Canary Mission’s profile frames her votes and statements as contradictory and accuses her of participating in “votes bankrolling the carnage,” citing specific bills and votes such as H.R.6126 and others in their criticism [3]. AJP Action’s scorecard lists numerous resolutions and positions — including ceasefire calls and resolutions standing with Israel — that together paint a complicated voting record [6]. These groups focus less on raw donation dollars and more on how votes align with donors’ agendas [3][6].
4. Media and partisan outlets: contested narratives about PAC money and travel
Conservative and right‑leaning outlets have run stories alleging Crockett accepted substantial PAC money and have highlighted trips and disclosures as evidence of compromised independence; examples in the supplied set include an AOL piece and other outlets accusing her of taking PAC funds or being “branded a hypocrite” for travel and donations [7][8]. These pieces claim PAC support but do not, in the cited snippets, isolate which PACs were explicitly pro‑Israel or pro‑Palestine [7][8].
5. What’s missing or not found in current reporting
Available sources in this selection do not present a single, sourced accounting that lists “X dollars from AIPAC, Y dollars from J Street, Z dollars from pro‑Palestine groups” to Crockett’s campaign. The excerpts reference that trackers like Track AIPAC and databases like OpenSecrets contain relevant data, but the provided snippets do not include the detailed transaction‑level evidence or a clear declaration of donations from explicitly pro‑Palestine groups [1][2]. No supplied source asserts definitively that she accepted or rejected AIPAC money beyond commentary and summaries (p1_s11 indicates a claim that she “has not accepted any AIPAC money” but is an uncited social post in the dataset).
6. How to get a definitive answer and why that matters
To establish a firm answer you must consult the full OpenSecrets donation breakdown and the Track AIPAC profile for Crockett (the sources cited here indicate those are the places where donation origins are tabulated) [1][2]. Watch for distinctions Track AIPAC and OpenSecrets make: some donations are from organizational PACs, others are from employees or affiliated individuals, and trackers sometimes interpret donations as “Israel‑related” based on donor affiliation rather than an explicit label from the donor [1][2]. That methodological nuance explains why different groups draw opposing conclusions about whether donations reflect pro‑Israel influence or simply ordinary political contributions.
Bottom line: trackers and watchdogs flag Jasmine Crockett in lists of members whose donations and votes are scrutinized on Israel–Palestine, and OpenSecrets holds the detailed filings those trackers rely on — but the excerpts provided do not supply a single, sourced dollar‑by‑dollar accounting showing dollar totals from explicitly pro‑Israel or explicitly pro‑Palestine groups to Crockett’s campaign [1][2][3].