What is Jasmine Crockett’s record on Palestine
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Jasmine Crockett has a mixed, contested record on Israel–Palestine: she has both supported some pro‑Israel resolutions and aid measures that drew criticism from progressive and Palestinian‑rights groups and publicly called for a ceasefire and praised the January 2025 Israel‑Hamas ceasefire/hostage deal [1] [2]. Advocacy groups and trackers describe her as having “a poor legislative record on Israel‑Palestine issues” and give her low marks on scorecards, while progressive databases list her individual votes on the conflict [3] [4].
1. Votes and scorecards: a picture of mixed signals
Crockett’s House votes are tracked by progressive vote databases and advocacy scorecards that catalogue how members vote on Israel‑Palestine matters; ProgressivePunch lists her specific roll‑calls on war and peace matters [4]. Independent trackers and outlets cited by commentators note she has voted for several aid packages and pro‑Israel resolutions during the Israel‑Hamas war, which has produced poor ratings from some Palestinian‑rights and progressive organizations [1] [3].
2. Public statements: calling for ceasefires and praising deals
On the public record, Crockett issued a statement welcoming the Israel‑Hamas ceasefire and hostage release deal announced in January 2025, framing it as “a great step towards halting the fighting in Gaza” and urging work toward a “permanent, lasting peace” [2]. Local and national outlets reprinted that praise and her emphasis on ending the humanitarian crisis in Gaza [5].
3. Criticisms from progressive and Palestine‑rights groups
Multiple sources report that progressive and Palestinian‑rights organizations have criticized Crockett’s legislative record; those groups have urged stronger calls for a Gaza ceasefire and given low marks on issue‑based scorecards, describing her record as poor on Israel‑Palestine issues [1] [3]. Activist sites go further, alleging votes for large aid packages and classifying her as complicit in policies they call “apartheid,” citing specific yes votes on funding bills [6].
4. Supporters’ view and her self‑positioning
Crockett and some supporters portray her approach as pragmatic unity politics rather than hardline alignment with either advocacy camp; Wikipedia notes Crockett has distanced herself from rigid labels and called her positions “common sense” [1]. Her public statement on the ceasefire frames the deal as compassionate relief for civilians and a step toward lasting peace, a position aimed at balancing humanitarian concerns and diplomatic progress [2].
5. Messaging actions that complicate perceptions
Beyond roll calls, Crockett’s public messaging — such as pro‑Israel holiday tweets picked up by advocacy sites — and other political behaviors are cited as evidence by critics who argue she tilts toward establishment positions; AIPAC‑linked pages have highlighted such messages in the past [7]. Conversely, her willingness to speak about ending aid fatigue or the need for ceasefire language at times is cited by others as evidence of independent thinking [6] [2].
6. What reporters and databases disagree about
Sources disagree on how to weight votes versus statements. Progressive trackers and activist organizations emphasize specific yes votes on aid bills and condemnatory resolutions as decisive evidence of a poor record [4] [6]. More neutral recountings, including Crockett’s own statements, highlight her public calls for ceasefire and relief — creating a record that is mixed rather than uniformly one-sided [2] [5].
7. Limits of available reporting and how to follow up
Available sources list votes and public statements but do not provide a comprehensive, item‑by‑item annotated ledger in this packet that ties every contested vote to a specific bill text or date; ProgressivePunch and VoteSmart can provide granular roll‑call detail but those pages are not fully quoted here [4] [8]. For a complete audit, consult roll‑call records (e.g., Congressional Clerk, Votesmart) and the full text of the specific resolutions and appropriations referenced by advocacy scorecards [4] [8].
Bottom line: Crockett’s record on Palestine is contested. Activist and progressive scorecards fault her for yes votes on aid and pro‑Israel measures; Crockett’s own public statements emphasize ceasefire diplomacy and humanitarian relief — producing a mixed, politically fraught record that different sources interpret in opposing ways [1] [2] [6].