Which votes has jasmine crockett cast against the congressional progressive caucus position?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Jasmine Crockett is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) and has been described as a progressive Democrat since taking office in 2023 [1] [2]. Available reporting compiled here indicates she has faced criticism from progressive and Palestinian-rights groups over some Israel–Palestine votes, but the provided sources do not include a comprehensive, sourced list of specific votes in which she broke from the caucus position [2] [3].
1. Who Crockett is, and her formal caucus membership
Jasmine Crockett represents Texas’s 30th District and is an identified member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, a fact confirmed on her official House biography and committee/caucus listings [4] [1]. This affiliation makes questions about party- or caucus-line deviations salient because the CPC issues public policy positions and sometimes organizes unified votes, but membership alone does not produce a public roll of every caucus position versus individual votes [1].
2. The narrow area where reporting flags disagreement: Israel–Palestine votes
The most specific theme in the assembled reporting is that Crockett’s voting record on Israel–Palestine has drawn criticism from certain progressive and Palestinian-rights organizations; those sources describe her as having made pro-Israel votes or supported aid measures during the Gaza war and say advocacy groups have given her low marks or urged a stronger ceasefire stance [2]. One outlet characterizes her as having opposed a bipartisan Israel aid bill that “lacked humanitarian components,” a charge that underscores where critics see her at odds with parts of the progressive base [3]. The sources, however, do not itemize the particular roll-call numbers, dates, or how those votes compared to a formal CPC-issued position.
3. What the available congressional records show (and what they don’t)
Congressional sources in this package include Crockett’s Congress.gov member page and GovTrack profile, which list bills she’s sponsored and track general legislative statistics [5] [6] [7]. Those pages confirm her legislative activity but the specific search results provided do not extract or present a curated list of votes where Crockett explicitly voted against a recorded CPC position. Therefore, while roll-call data exist publicly on House and tracking sites, the present source set does not include the necessary roll-call citations to definitively enumerate all instances of dissent from the CPC line [5] [6].
4. Political context that may shape reports of “breaking” with progressives
Some political outlets and commentators frame Crockett as a high-profile progressive whose flirtations with statewide ambitions and media visibility have produced intra-party friction and sharpened scrutiny of her voting record [8] [9]. Other accounts highlight how outside actors—Republican operatives or pollsters—may amplify or weaponize narratives about her record to influence primaries or recruitment [10]. These dynamics mean that critiques of her votes can reflect both substantive disagreements and strategic political positioning; the sources show debate exists but do not translate that into a verified roll-call list of CPC dissent [8] [10].
5. Bottom line: reporting gap and where to look next
The assembled sources demonstrate that Crockett is a CPC member and that critics—especially around Israel–Palestine policy—have asserted she voted contrary to some progressive expectations [1] [2] [3]. They do not, however, provide a sourced catalog of specific roll-call votes where she explicitly cast ballots against documented, formal positions of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. To produce that definitive list one would need to cross-reference CPC public position statements on particular bills with House roll-call records (available on Congress.gov and the House clerk’s roll-call pages) and outside trackers like GovTrack — steps the current source set does not complete [5] [6] [7].