Has Jasmine Crockett voted on US aid to Israel or Gaza and how did she vote?
Executive summary
Representative Jasmine Crockett cast at least one notable recorded vote in favor of H.R. 8034, the Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act (reported by advocacy site Reverse Canary Mission as an April 20, 2024 yea), and she publicly said she voted “NO” on a later, more partisan Israel aid bill on November 2, 2023 (her office press release) [1] [2]. Sources differ in emphasis: her congressional office highlights opposing a specific partisan package [2] while advocacy critics contend she supported major Israel supplemental funding in April 2024 [1].
1. The basic record: at least one “yea” on a big 2024 Israel supplemental, and a separate “no” on a 2023 bill
Crockett’s office filed a press release stating she voted “NO” on a November 2, 2023 Israel aid package that she described as excluding humanitarian aid for Gaza and Ukraine [2]. Separately, a critical advocacy profile asserts Crockett voted “yea” on H.R. 8034, an April 20, 2024 Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act that the profile says allocated about $26.38 billion for Israel [1]. Those two items are not contradictory: one is a public statement of opposition to a 2023 measure; the other is an allegation of support for a different 2024 supplemental [2] [1].
2. What each source emphasizes and why that matters
Crockett’s official press release frames her vote as opposing what she called a “partisan” bill that lacked Gaza humanitarian aid and Ukrainian assistance, signaling a public position that seeks to balance ally support with protection for civilians [2]. The Reverse Canary Mission profile frames votes differently: it interprets recorded “yea” votes on major funding as evidence Crockett “bankrolled” Israel’s military campaign and criticizes her progressive credentials [1]. The two perspectives reveal competing political aims: the congresswoman’s office seeks to justify selective opposition to some legislation, while advocacy critics use vote-level claims to challenge her stance on Israel–Palestine [2] [1].
3. What the advocacy criticism claims and its specific allegation
Reverse Canary Mission’s piece accuses Crockett of voting “yea” on H.R. 8034 (April 20, 2024), describing the bill as a $26.38 billion package that included Iron Dome funding and offensive munitions; the profile uses UN casualty counts at that time to underline its moral critique [1]. That source has an explicit advocacy aim: it seeks to document and condemn what it frames as complicity in Israel’s actions [1]. The profile attributes direct policy consequences to the vote—an argument critics make to hold lawmakers accountable for foreign-aid decisions [1].
4. Corroboration and limits in the available reporting
Available sources here include Crockett’s press statements, an advocacy dossier, a generalized Wikipedia summary, and third‑party scorecards; none included a full, checkable roll-call list in these search results to independently confirm every cited floor vote or tally [2] [1] [3] [4]. Wikipedia summarizes that her voting record on Israel–Palestine has drawn criticism and notes she supported “several pro‑Israel resolutions and aid measures” without itemizing each roll call in these excerpts [3]. Therefore, while the advocacy piece explicitly names an April 2024 yea and the congresswoman’s site names a November 2023 no, a full roll-call confirmation is not contained in the results provided here [1] [2] [3].
5. How supporters and critics frame her actions
Crockett’s press material frames at least some opposition as principled: voting no on a package that omitted Gaza humanitarian aid and Ukraine assistance [2]. Critics use individual yea votes on large supplementals to argue she enabled military operations and undermined calls for a ceasefire; that criticism is voiced on advocacy platforms with explicit aims to pressure lawmakers [1] [4]. Both frames are political: the office emphasizes legislative nuance, critics emphasize moral consequence [2] [1] [4].
6. What is not found in current reporting and how to verify further
The set of provided sources does not include an official roll‑call record or a Congressional Clerk page listing H.R. 8034 and the full vote tally to independently verify the April 20, 2024 vote attributed to Crockett (not found in current reporting). To settle the question definitively, consult the House roll‑call records (Clerk of the House or Congressional Record) or reliable vote databases, which are not present among the retrieved documents (not found in current reporting).
Summary: public statements and advocacy reporting point in different directions depending on which bill and moment you examine—Crockett’s office documented a November 2023 “NO” [2], while an advocacy dossier attributes an April 2024 “yea” on a major Israel supplemental [1]. The available reporting here does not include the full official roll‑call pages needed for definitive confirmation of every cited vote (not found in current reporting).