How did jasmine crockett vote on the 2024 and 2025 military aid packages for israel and what reasons did she give?
Executive summary
Rep. Jasmine Crockett voted “No” on the House GOP-led standalone Israel security supplemental H.R.6126 on November 2, 2023, calling that package “partisan, inadequate, and fiscally irresponsible” [1] [2]. Available sources show she supported later, larger bipartisan Israel aid measures in 2024 and issued public statements calling for ceasefires and humanitarian relief in 2025, but reporting differs on which specific 2024 and 2025 roll calls she backed; some advocacy trackers say she voted for a $26 billion 2024 package while Crockett’s own office emphasizes conditional or humanitarian concerns [3] [4] [5].
1. The November 2023 “No” vote and Crockett’s explanation
When the House considered the GOP-authored Israel supplemental (H.R.6126) in late 2023, Crockett voted “Nay” and released a statement condemning the measure as “partisan, inadequate, and fiscally irresponsible,” framing her opposition around process and content — not a blanket refusal to assist Israel [1] [2]. Her office’s press release explicitly criticized the Republican package’s partisan design and funding priorities [1].
2. Mixed public record in 2024 — votes, advocacy trackers, and interpretations
Multiple sources show Crockett’s 2024 record is mixed: independent trackers and summaries (including Wikipedia and advocacy sites) report she supported several pro‑Israel funding measures after October 2023 and voted for a $26 billion Israel aid package in 2024, while also supporting some non‑funding pro‑Israel resolutions [3] [4]. These resources cast her as having voted for certain substantial aid measures in 2024 even as she at times criticized particular bills’ content or exclusions [3] [4]. Congressional roll‑call compilations note she opposed at least one Republican-crafted supplemental (H.R.6126) but do not list every later vote in the provided snippets [2] [6].
3. How Crockett explained her votes — humanitarian and conditional language
Crockett’s public statements emphasize humanitarian concerns and the need for ceasefire and aid into Gaza. For example, after the January 2025 Israel‑Hamas ceasefire/hostage deal she praised progress toward ending violence and delivering aid to Palestinian civilians [5] [7]. Sources indicate she publicly urged reduced civilian harm and urged U.S. policy to seek humanitarian protections, which suggests her votes and statements were sometimes framed as balancing Israel’s security with Palestinian humanitarian needs [8] [5].
4. Advocacy organizations’ critiques and alternative readings
Progressive and Palestinian‑rights groups have criticized Crockett’s record, arguing that votes for large aid packages amounted to sustaining Israeli military operations; one advocacy profile explicitly accuses her of voting “yea” on a 2024 $26B package and on resolutions backing Israeli defense while issuing sporadic calls for ceasefires — an interpretation that frames her as prioritizing party unity and Israel’s security over stronger conditioning of aid [3]. Other scorecards and summaries show she opposed specific bills that lacked humanitarian elements, underscoring a tension between voting choices and public rhetoric [8] [9].
5. Official record vs. outside trackers — gaps and limits
Congressional vote databases (C‑SPAN, Congress.gov compilations) clearly record her “No” on H.R.6126 and list other roll calls, but the provided search results do not include full, itemized roll calls for every 2024 and 2025 aid measure; therefore a definitive roll‑call list for every Israel‑related funding vote in those two years is not fully available in the supplied material [2] [6]. Where outside trackers (advocacy sites, Wikipedia summaries) attribute additional “yea” votes to Crockett in 2024, those assertions appear in the sources but must be weighed against Crockett’s own press releases and statements emphasizing humanitarian conditions [3] [1] [5].
6. What Crockett said publicly — themes and political positioning
Crockett’s public messaging in the provided sources combines criticism of partisan processes, calls for humanitarian relief and ceasefire, and occasional support for broader bipartisan aid measures. Her office condemned narrowly written Republican packages as inadequate while later praising ceasefire deals that promised humanitarian access and hostage releases [1] [5]. Journalistic and advocacy sources interpret that mix differently: some see principled conditionality, others see votes that ultimately enabled significant military assistance [3] [4].
Limitations: available sources do not provide a complete roll‑by‑roll record of every 2024 and 2025 Israel‑related funding vote by Crockett; where roll calls are cited (H.R.6126, press releases, advocacy trackers), they are noted above [2] [1] [3].