How has jasmine crockett voted on major progressive priorities like medicare-for-all and the Green New Deal?
Executive summary
Jasmine Crockett has publicly and legislatively aligned with major progressive priorities: she formally cosponsored the Medicare for All Act in the 118th Congress and has been described in reporting as supporting the framework of the Green New Deal [1] [2]. Her broader voting record and public statements — including opposition to Republican budget measures seen as cutting social programs — reinforce a progressive posture, though available roll-call records in the provided sources do not show floor passage votes for a nationwide single-payer bill or a standalone Green New Deal measure [3] [4].
1. Medicare‑for‑All — she cosponsored the bill, which is the clearest affirmative action on single‑payer
Congressional records list Representative Crockett as a cosponsor of H.R.3421, the Medicare for All Act, on May 17, 2023, a formal legislative commitment that signals support for replacing private insurance with a single‑payer federal system [1]. Cosponsorship is a concrete legislative action distinct from a recorded yea/nay floor vote: it puts a member on the sponsor list and publicly ties them to the text, and in Crockett’s case that is the explicit available evidence of her support in the provided sources [1] [5]. The documents provided do not contain a roll‑call floor vote on H.R.3421 or a separate recorded vote on Medicare‑for‑All that would show how she voted in a passage or amendment context, so the cosponsorship is the principal, verifiable indicator in these sources [1] [4].
2. The Green New Deal — public support for the framework, but no specific cosponsorship record in these sources
Reporting on Crockett describes her as supporting the framework of the Green New Deal and demanding bold climate action, language that places her within the progressive climate wing of the Democratic caucus [2]. The provided legislative trackers and official pages (BillTrack50, Congress.gov listings) do not, in the assembled excerpts, show a named Green New Deal resolution cosponsorship or a distinct roll‑call on a Green New Deal measure; therefore the strongest claim that can be made from these sources is policy alignment reported by news outlets rather than an explicit, cited roll‑call or bill sponsorship in Congress’s legislative database excerpts included here [6] [4] [2].
3. Broader voting record and political posture — consistently progressive by multiple measures
Outside of single‑issue bills, Crockett’s public materials and third‑party trackers portray her as a progressive Democrat: her campaign and House pages catalog sponsored and cosponsored legislation and emphasize healthcare, climate, and economic equity [5] [2]. GovTrack’s 2024 report card highlights her legislative activity and relative standing within the Texas delegation, and Ballotpedia frames her as a progressive figure in recent campaigns [7] [8]. Conversely, Heritage Action’s 118th Congress scorecard gives Crockett a low conservative score (17%), which indirectly signals alignment with progressive priorities and opposition to the conservative policy agenda [9]. Her public statement after voting against a Republican budget bill—pledging not to cut Medicaid or SNAP in her district—underscores a priority on protecting social programs [3].
4. What the record shows — and what remains unverified in the provided sources
The available, cited evidence is clear on one front: Crockett cosponsored Medicare for All, which is a direct legislative endorsement of a core progressive demand [1]. Reporting and her public materials also place her in favor of Green New Deal–style climate ambition, though the provided excerpts do not contain Congressional cosponsorship or roll‑call documentation for a Green New Deal resolution attributed to her [2] [4]. There are roll‑call entries in Congress.gov listed in the sources, but the snippets do not map those votes to Medicare for All or Green New Deal text; therefore, assessing how she voted on hypothetical or future floor efforts on these exact proposals is not possible from the sources provided [4]. Any deeper claim about her floor‑vote record on those specific flagship progressive bills requires consulting full roll‑call datasets or her office’s comprehensive vote log beyond the excerpts given [4] [5].