Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How many air strikes has joe Biden authorized
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, no source contains a specific numerical count of airstrikes authorized by President Joe Biden. The available information reveals several documented instances of military action:
- Syria strike on Iran-backed militias - described as the first military action undertaken by the Biden administration [1]
- Strikes on Iranian-aligned groups following attacks on US troops in Iraq [2]
- Various military conflicts and decisions involving Biden's use of military power, including drone strikes and airstrikes [3]
The sources consistently discuss Biden's authorization of military strikes in Middle East contexts, particularly targeting Iran-backed militias and Iranian-aligned groups [4] [2] [1]. However, none provide the comprehensive numerical data needed to answer the original question definitively.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks crucial context about policy changes and operational frameworks under the Biden administration:
- New rules governing lethal strikes outside recognized warzones have been implemented, requiring presidential approval before drone strikes or commando raids can be launched [5]
- The Biden administration has signaled limits on US reliance on drone strikes, representing a potential shift from previous administrations [5]
- There's ongoing congressional oversight concerns, with lawmakers pressing Biden to get Congress' approval for Middle East airstrikes [4]
Alternative perspectives on military action authorization:
- Congressional progressives have expressed upset over Biden's use of military power in regions like Yemen [3]
- Civil liberties organizations like the ACLU have commented on the administration's drone strike policies [6]
- International law experts have criticized drone strikes as unlawful and counterproductive in suppressing terrorism [7]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question, while straightforward, assumes comprehensive tracking and public disclosure of all presidential military authorizations exists. This assumption may be problematic because:
- Presidential military actions have become routine without detailed public accounting [8]
- The question implies there should be a readily available, specific number when operational security and classification issues may prevent complete public disclosure
- The framing suggests simple quantification of complex military decisions that involve various types of operations, targets, and legal frameworks
The question also lacks temporal boundaries - it doesn't specify whether it's asking about Biden's entire presidency, specific conflicts, or particular time periods, which could lead to incomplete or misleading answers even if numerical data were available.