Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Did joe biden support the release of 140 hostages in gaza

Checked on October 17, 2025

Executive Summary

There is no clear, corroborated evidence in the provided reporting that President Joe Biden specifically supported or orchestrated the release of “140 hostages” in Gaza; the available analyses attribute individual releases or negotiations to direct Hamas-U.S. contacts or to the actions of other leaders and mediators. The materials supplied emphasize releases of particular hostages and high-level diplomatic engagement but do not substantiate the numeric claim nor Biden’s direct role in a 140-hostage release [1] [2].

1. What the original claim actually asserts — and why it matters for verification

The original statement asks whether Joe Biden "supported the release of 140 hostages in Gaza," a compound claim combining a specific number [3] and an actor (President Biden). Verifying it requires contemporaneous reporting that both confirms the release of 140 hostages as a discrete event and documents Biden’s explicit support or operational role in that release. The supplied source summaries do record hostage releases and U.S. involvement in negotiations, but they stop short of linking Biden to a 140-hostage release, leaving the core components of the claim unproven [1].

2. What the supplied reporting actually documents about hostage releases

The available analyses describe the release of specific hostages, including an American hostage released after negotiations involving Hamas and the United States, and discussion of ceasefire and negotiation efforts in Gaza. These accounts highlight direct Hamas-U.S. communications or diplomatic channels, but they do not present a single, verifiable event in which exactly 140 hostages were released as part of a Biden-endorsed deal. Reporting emphasizes discrete, often bilateral releases rather than a mass release credited to one leader [1] [4].

3. Where Biden’s involvement appears in the material — and where it does not

Across the supplied analyses, references to presidential involvement point to high-level discussions between U.S. and Israeli leaders, and in some pieces, to actions or statements by other presidents. None of the provided items contains a definitive statement that Biden personally supported a 140-hostage release or negotiated such a swap. Several documents explicitly lack mention of Biden in the context of the releases they cover, underscoring an absence of affirmative evidence in this dataset [2] [5] [6].

4. Alternative actors and narratives present in the reporting

The analyses attribute negotiation roles or public claims to actors other than Biden, including Hamas directly negotiating releases, U.S. officials facilitating contacts, and other political leaders being credited in some reporting. One set of summaries highlights reporting that emphasizes President Trump’s actions or statements in the region during the same period. These alternative narratives show that credit for hostage releases is contested and often framed to advance differing political narratives, yet none in this collection confirms the 140 figure tied to Biden [1] [7] [4].

5. Timeline and factual gaps you should notice

The supplied source summaries span dates in late 2025 and reference discrete releases around that time, including a last American hostage and mediation efforts. However, the material lacks a consolidated timeline documenting a single mass release event of 140 hostages, and it lacks contemporaneous documentation of Biden endorsing such an event. The gap between documented individual releases and the larger numeric claim is significant and unresolved in these analyses [1] [2].

6. How bias and framing in these brief summaries could generate confusion

Each source summary carries potential biases: some emphasize particular leaders, others focus on single hostage stories or policy framing. When reporting names a president prominently in related diplomacy, readers may infer direct credit for outcomes not substantiated by the text. The supplied analyses illustrate this dynamic: reported releases and negotiations exist, but linkage to Biden and the exact number 140 appears to be an extrapolation rather than a documented fact in the materials provided [2] [6] [1].

7. Bottom line and recommended next steps for verification

Based on the supplied reporting, the claim that Joe Biden supported the release of 140 hostages in Gaza is not supported: the sources record individual releases and diplomatic engagement but do not corroborate the specific number nor Biden’s explicit role in such a mass release [1]. To resolve this definitively, consult primary, dated reporting from major international outlets or official statements from the White House, Hamas, Israel, and recognized mediators that explicitly state both the 140 figure and Biden’s involvement.

Want to dive deeper?
What was the US role in negotiating the release of 140 hostages in Gaza?
How did the Biden administration respond to the Gaza hostage crisis?
What were the terms of the hostage release agreement in Gaza?
Did Joe Biden communicate directly with Israeli or Palestinian leaders during the hostage crisis?
How did the international community react to the release of hostages in Gaza?