Joe bidens pardens
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
President Joe Biden used his clemency powers extensively in his term—issuing large-scale commutations (including a Jan. 17–19, 2025 surge) and pardons for individuals and groups such as thousands with simple marijuana possession convictions and high-profile preemptive pardons in January 2025 [1] [2] [3]. His administration’s official Justice Department lists record numbers of commutations and pardons through January 19, 2025, while critics and GOP investigators later challenged the process and legality of some actions [4] [5] [6].
1. A record-setting use of clemency, by the numbers
The Justice Department’s Office of the Pardon Attorney documents multiple batches of commutations and pardons across Biden’s term, with lists updated through January 19, 2025, reflecting thousands of acts of clemency including a 2,490-person commutation announcement [4] [1]. Independent researchers reported that Biden granted more clemency actions than any president on record during his four years, noting broad-scale pardons by proclamation for federal marijuana offenses in October 2022 and December 2023 [2].
2. Who was covered — from low-level offenders to political figures
Biden’s clemency portfolio included classwide proclamations for simple marijuana possession, mass commutations of people serving long drug sentences, and targeted, high-profile preemptive pardons in his final days for family members and public figures such as Dr. Anthony Fauci and Gen. Mark Milley [2] [1] [3]. Media lists and White House statements show family pardons (e.g., Hunter Biden and several Biden siblings) and a suite of preemptive pardons for officials linked to the Jan. 6 committee and other politically sensitive targets [7] [3] [8].
3. The Hunter Biden pardon and presidential statements
The White House released a formal statement recording a pardon for R. Hunter Biden, dated December 1, 2024, with President Biden asserting he had resisted interfering with Justice Department decisions before acting [7]. Coverage highlights that the Hunter pardon reversed earlier public promises not to intervene in DOJ matters and became a focal point for critics who argued the action was politically fraught [7] [8].
4. Preemptive pardons in the final hours and political fallout
Multiple outlets reported that, in the waning minutes of his presidency, Biden issued preemptive pardons for relatives and other figures he said faced politically motivated probes; Reuters, BBC, CNBC and others described the move as broad and controversial [3] [8] [9]. News coverage emphasized the political consequences: Democrats warned about precedents set by broad final-day pardons, while opponents framed them as favoritism or obstruction of accountability [3] [8].
5. Legal questions and partisan challenges after Biden left office
After the administration ended, opponents mounted legal and political challenges. Republican-led oversight concluded in a later report that actions signed with an autopen might be “void,” alleging concerns about presidential capacity and contemporaneous approvals, a claim examined by CNN and other outlets [6]. Legal experts quoted by Reuters and other reporting said courts, not a successor president, would decide pardon validity, and pointed out there is no simple executive mechanism to unilaterally cancel a predecessor’s pardon [10] [11].
6. Competing interpretations: clemency as reform vs. overreach
Proponents framed Biden’s actions as criminal-justice reform—correcting sentencing disparities and relieving people serving disproportionately long sentences, especially for drug offenses—and noted mass commutations aimed to address systemic inequities [1] [2]. Critics characterized some preemptive pardons as political shielding and questioned whether the timing and scope represented abuse of the pardon power [8] [3]. Both interpretations appear across the sources cited.
7. What the sources do not resolve
Available sources document the pardons, commutations and subsequent partisan disputes, but available sources do not mention definitive judicial rulings invalidating specific Biden pardons as of the dates cited [10] [6]. Reports differ on whether an autopen was actually used for particular clemency documents; several outlets explicitly say it is “not known” whether the device was used on pardons [10] [11].
Limitations and bottom line: the Justice Department records and White House releases provide the primary public record of who received clemency and when [5] [4] [1]. Subsequent political and legal challenges have been raised by GOP investigators and by the succeeding administration, but courts would be the arbiter of any contest about validity and those outcomes are not documented in the provided sources [10] [6].