Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Julie Green Prophecy 🚨 God Revealed Obama’s Secret Scandal—The Truth They Won’t Tell!
Executive Summary
The claim that “Julie Green prophecy: God revealed Obama’s secret scandal” is unsupported by the available documents: none of the supplied sources contain verifiable evidence that Julie Green delivered a prophetic revelation exposing a factual “secret scandal” tied to Barack Obama. The materials provided are predominantly live-video transcripts and unrelated files or code snippets, while separate government and encyclopedic records discuss alleged administrative controversies without connecting them to a prophetic disclosure; therefore the specific prophetic claim is unsubstantiated [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9].
1. What the claim actually alleges and why it matters — reading the headline loudly
The headline asserts a direct causal narrative: Julie Green received divine revelation that exposed a hidden Obama scandal, presented as truth that “they won’t tell.” The significance of such an assertion would be high because it frames a religious prophecy as new factual evidence about a former president. The supplied materials do not contain corroborating primary documents, investigative findings, or mainstream reporting that would satisfy ordinary standards for establishing a new political scandal; instead, the evidence in the packet is primarily a live faith-oriented broadcast transcript and several unrelated technical files, leaving the claim without documentary support [1] [2] [3].
2. The closest available material — live faith broadcast vs. scandal evidence
The only directly relevant item is a transcript of a live video that discusses faith, God, and current events; this source does not state a concrete Obama scandal revealed by prophecy and reads as religious commentary rather than factual exposure of a new criminal or political event [1]. Two other items provided are JavaScript or technical content that do not substantively engage with the prophecy claim, and a third text collection likewise lacks direct reference to an identified secret scandal tied to Obama. Taken together, the packet shows commentary and fringe material, not verifiable evidence [2] [3].
3. Official records and mainstream history referenced in the packet — different topics, different standards
The supplied set includes references to an Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) press release and related items claiming “new evidence” about actions around 2016. These ODNI-referenced materials (dated July and December 2025 in the packet) claim to reveal contested interpretations of intelligence community assessments, but they do not link to any prophetic revelation by Julie Green nor do they establish a hidden Obama-era scandal exposed by divine means; they address institutional analysis and alleged procedural issues within intelligence reporting rather than a prophetic disclosure [4] [5]. A Britannica-style summary notes historical controversies during Obama’s presidency but contains no new prophetic link [6].
4. Media fragments and fringe voices — narrative spread without verification
Other supplied content includes a Times of India snippet about a MAGA ‘prophet’ and several comment collections that discuss religious figures or partisan critiques but do not document a verifiable prophecy exposing a factual Obama scandal. These items illustrate how prophetic claims and political allegations circulate in media and social ecosystems but they represent opinion, rhetoric, or disconnected commentary rather than corroborated revelations. The provenance and purpose of these fragments suggest agenda-driven amplification rather than evidentiary reporting [7] [9] [8].
5. Contrasting viewpoints and possible agendas in the packet
Available sources demonstrate two different patterns: institutional documents framing intelligence disputes and informal faith or partisan communications asserting prophetic insight. The ODNI materials appear to pursue an institutional audit or partisan reinterpretation of intelligence assessments, while the faith-based and fringe materials appear aimed at mobilizing belief or political sentiment. The packet mixes these categories without showing an evidentiary chain connecting a prophecy to actionable discovery about Obama, creating a risk of conflating emotional claims with factual findings [4] [1] [7].
6. What’s missing to substantiate the claim — a checklist for responsible verification
To convert the headline into an established fact would require: verifiable contemporaneous documentation of the alleged prophetic statement; independent journalistic or legal corroboration linking the statement to verifiable misconduct by Obama; primary-source evidence (documents, recordings, records) establishing the scandal; and corroboration from neutral, authoritative institutions. None of these elements are present in the provided materials; instead the packet contains commentary, technical noise, and agency communications about intelligence assessments unrelated to a prophetic revelation [1] [2] [4] [5].
7. Bottom line for readers: what to believe and what remains unresolved
The claim that Julie Green prophesied and thereby revealed an Obama “secret scandal” is unsupported by the documents provided and should be treated as unverified. The packet contains opinion and institutional documents on separate matters but offers no direct, contemporaneous, corroborated evidence tying a prophetic declaration to a concrete, previously unknown scandal. Readers should demand primary-source documentation and independent investigation before accepting a claim that combines religious prophecy and high-stakes political allegations [1] [4] [7].