Which of Julie Green's political predictions have been verified as accurate?

1. What the available reporting actually contains

The MarketFaith Ministries article critiques Julie Green’s status as a prophet and compares her to historical figures who made failed predictions, but it focuses on general skepticism and theological objections rather than compiling a list of political predictions and outcomes ^[1]. The Rumble channel entry simply lists a channel where Julie Green posts prophetic videos; that listing does not summarize or verify any particular predictions or their outcomes ^[2].

2. Why you can’t confirm “verified” predictions from these sources

Neither source provides a clear inventory of Julie Green’s political predictions, timestamps for those predictions, nor follow-up reporting that tests predictions against real-world events. The MarketFaith piece discusses the problem of prophets failing to predict major historical events and implies skepticism of modern prophetic claims but does not verify or validate any of Green’s specific claims ^[1]. The Rumble page is an index of videos without independent verification or commentary ^[2].

3. What the critical source argues and its limitations

MarketFaith Ministries frames Green within a skeptical theological critique, arguing modern prophetic claims often fail to predict consequential events and referencing historical examples of leaders who made false prophecies; it therefore urges caution about accepting prophetic political forecasts ^[1]. That critique is explicit but selective: it highlights general patterns and theological consequences rather than offering documented, evidence‑based adjudication of particular predictions by Julie Green ^[1].

4. What the Rumble presence indicates — and what it does not

Julie Green’s Rumble channel shows she disseminates prophetic content publicly, which provides timestamps and primary-source material that could be used to test predictions if someone compiled and analyzed those videos ^[2]. However, the channel listing itself contains no independent fact‑checking or summaries of outcomes, so it cannot be used by itself to claim which predictions were accurate ^[2].

5. How to proceed if you want a definitive answer

To determine which of Julie Green’s political predictions have been verified, researchers should (a) compile a dated list of specific political predictions from her public videos or writings (e.g., from the Rumble channel) and (b) match each prediction against independent, time-stamped events and reliable reporting. The current sources do not perform steps (a) or (b) for you ^{[2] [1]}.

6. Caveats, competing perspectives, and transparency about sources

MarketFaith presents a skeptical theological perspective that treats prophetic failure as grounds for rejection and warns of historical examples where prophetic claims misled followers ^[1]. Supporters of Julie Green, who might argue some predictions were fulfilled, are not represented in the provided sources; such claims are not present in the search results and therefore “not found in current reporting” here ^{[2] [1]}. The Rumble channel could contain supportive material, but that is primary-source content rather than independent verification ^[2].

7. Bottom line for your question

Available sources supplied for this query do not provide documented, verifiable examples of Julie Green’s political predictions being confirmed. The MarketFaith piece questions prophetic reliability but does not validate specific predictions, and the Rumble channel lists her videos without verification ^{[1] [2]}. If you want, I can: (A) search for more reporting or fact-checks that evaluate specific predictions, or (B) extract dated political predictions from her Rumble videos so we can test them against historical events.