Fact check: What were the official election results for Kamala Harris in New York county?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses reveal that none of the sources provide the official election results for Kamala Harris in New York county as requested in the original question. Instead, all three sources focus on a lawsuit filed by SMART Legislation that challenges the accuracy of the 2024 election results in Rockland County, New York ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

The lawsuit alleges statistical anomalies and missing votes in both the presidential and Senate races in Rockland County ^{[1] [2]}. The legal action seeks a full hand recount of the 2024 Presidential and U.S. Senate races in Rockland County ^[3]. The case has advanced to a discovery process where document requests and questions have been submitted to the Rockland County Board of Elections ^[3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks important geographical specificity. The analyses reveal discussion about Rockland County specifically, not New York County (Manhattan) as asked in the question ^{[1] [2] [3]}. This distinction is crucial as New York state contains multiple counties with different election results.

The sources focus entirely on allegations of voting irregularities rather than providing official certified results ^{[1] [2]}. Missing from this coverage are:

• The official response from election authorities defending the integrity of the results
• The actual certified vote totals that would answer the original question
• Context about whether similar lawsuits have been filed in other New York counties
• Information about the legal standards required to prove election irregularities

SMART Legislation, the organization filing the lawsuit, would benefit from increased attention and credibility if their claims of election irregularities gain traction ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Conversely, election officials and the broader electoral system would benefit from maintaining public confidence in certified results.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself does not contain misinformation, as it simply asks for factual election results. However, the complete absence of actual election results in the search results suggests potential algorithmic bias toward controversy and legal challenges rather than straightforward factual information ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

The framing in the sources, particularly the phrase "Kamala Harris voters 'erased'" ^[2], uses emotionally charged language that could mislead readers into believing proven fraud occurred, when the sources only describe allegations in an ongoing lawsuit. This type of language can contribute to unfounded skepticism about election integrity before legal proceedings are complete.