Fact check: Did Kamala Harris really receive zero votes in new York county?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, yes, Kamala Harris did receive zero votes in multiple districts within Rockland County, New York (not "New York County" as stated in the original question). The evidence shows that in four specific districts in Ramapo (which is part of Rockland County), voting machines recorded zero votes for Harris despite voters claiming they voted for her ^{[1] [2]}.

The situation involves significant statistical anomalies where hundreds of voters selected Democratic Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, yet not a single vote was recorded for Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris in the same districts ^{[3] [4] [5]}. Voters have come forward with sworn affidavits stating they voted for Harris, contradicting the machine tallies ^[6].

A lawsuit has been filed by SMART Legislation challenging these results, and a judge has set a timeline for addressing the election results lawsuit ^[5]. The case specifically highlights irregularities that are reportedly familiar to Rockland County voters ^[4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial geographical specificity - it refers to "New York County" when the actual issue occurred in Rockland County, New York. This distinction is important as New York County refers to Manhattan, while Rockland County is a separate jurisdiction.

An alternative explanation for these anomalies is provided through the concept of "bloc voting" patterns in Rockland County ^[4]. This suggests that the statistical irregularities might be explained by coordinated voting behaviors within certain communities, rather than machine malfunctions or fraud.

Experts urge caution in interpreting statistical irregularities while also emphasizing the importance of investigating these claims ^[3]. This balanced perspective suggests that while the zero-vote tallies are factually accurate, their cause and significance remain under investigation.

The analyses also reveal that election integrity advocates and legal organizations would benefit from pursuing these claims, as successful challenges could lead to broader election reform measures and increased scrutiny of voting systems.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains a geographical inaccuracy by referring to "New York County" instead of the correct "Rockland County." This error could mislead readers about the scope and location of the alleged voting irregularities.

The phrasing "really receive zero votes" implies skepticism about the claim's validity, potentially introducing bias toward dismissing legitimate concerns about voting irregularities. The question format suggests the asker may be seeking confirmation of a predetermined belief rather than objective information.

Additionally, the question lacks context about the ongoing legal proceedings and the fact that this is part of a formal lawsuit with sworn testimony, which are significant factors in assessing the credibility of the claims ^{[6] [5]}.