What share of total votes did Kamala Harris receive in the 2024 presidential election?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Kamala Harris received roughly 48.4% of the national popular vote in the 2024 presidential election, equal to about 75.0 million votes according to a running, compiled result used by the Financial Times (48.4%, 75,019,268 votes) [1]. Multiple outlets reported similar high single‑digit totals for Harris (roughly mid‑ to high‑70 million votes) even as final certified tallies and rounding produced small differences between sources [2] [3].
1. The single best reported answer: 48.4% (≈75.02 million votes)
A widely cited aggregated result from the Financial Times’ live results page lists Kamala Harris at 48.4% of the national popular vote with 75,019,268 votes [1], a figure consistent with contemporaneous media tallies that placed her total in the mid‑70 million range [2]. That 48.4% share contrasts with Donald Trump’s reported 49.9% (77,303,564 votes) on the same FT results page, which tracks state‑by‑state returns as they were certified or updated [1].
2. Why other reported totals can differ by a million or more — competing tallies and certification timing
Different outlets published slightly different raw vote totals in the weeks after Election Day because vote counts were still being certified and media organizations used different cutoffs and data feeds; for example, one contemporary report put Harris near 74.3 million votes as her tally climbed during the canvass [2], while other summaries cited roughly 75 million [1] [3]. News organizations and aggregators update as states certify, so a snapshot from mid‑November can differ meaningfully from the final certified count finalized weeks later [1] [3].
3. Popular vote share vs. Electoral College: what the numbers meant in practice
Harris’ near‑48.4% of the popular vote did not translate into an Electoral College victory; major outlets reported Donald Trump winning enough electoral votes to reach or exceed the 270 threshold while Harris finished with 226 electoral votes in the media map projection [4] [5]. State‑level outcomes — where Harris carried large Democratic states such as those on the West Coast and parts of the Northeast while Trump carried broad swaths of the country — produced the disparity between the national vote share and the electoral result [4] [1].
4. Context matters: turnout, coalition shifts and why the margin tightened
Analysts and data firms noted that Harris’ vote total was historically large in absolute terms (among the highest-ever single‑candidate tallies) but that Democrats’ coalition was weaker in parts of the electorate that decide close states; Catalist reported declines in key subgroup turnout and support that depressed Harris’ margins compared with prior Democratic peaks, and Cook Political Report summarized that Harris lost roughly two points of support among 2020 voters and failed to attract enough new or infrequent voters [6] [7]. Pre‑election polls showed a tight race — YouGov’s MRP and the PBS/Marist final polls both had Harris narrowly ahead in late October/early November — which foreshadowed a close national popular vote [8] [9].
5. Caveats, alternative figures and limits of available reporting
The precise decimal of Harris’ national share depends on which certified final count one uses; contemporary reporting shows close but not identical vote counts (FT’s 48.4%, ~75.02M; other outlets referenced ~74.3M or rounded 75M figures) and different aggregation timestamps produce small variances [1] [2] [3]. This account uses the Financial Times compiled result as the clearest single published percentage in the provided sources [1], and notes that media tallies and later official certification can adjust raw vote totals slightly [3].