Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: What were the reactions to Karoline Leavitt's Traoré comment on social media?

Checked on June 26, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, there is no credible evidence that Karoline Leavitt made any comment about Ibrahim Traoré, the President of Burkina Faso. The search results reveal that the alleged incident is completely fabricated.

Snopes and other fact-checking organizations have definitively debunked the claim that Leavitt told Traoré to "sit down, boy" [1] [2]. The sources confirm that:

  • There is no evidence to support the claim that such an interaction ever occurred [1]
  • Reputable news outlets have not reported on any such incident [1]
  • There is no record of Leavitt and Traoré ever meeting [2]
  • The videos circulating on social media are AI-generated content [1] [2]

Instead of finding reactions to a Traoré comment, the analyses uncovered discussions about Leavitt's other controversial moments, including her calling a reporter's question "stupid," which sparked controversy and debate across social media platforms [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question assumes that Karoline Leavitt made a comment about Traoré, but this assumption is fundamentally incorrect. The missing context includes:

  • The entire premise is based on misinformation - no such comment was ever made [1] [2]
  • The videos showing this alleged interaction are explicitly labeled as fictional content with disclaimers stating "the situations and dialogues described are entirely imaginary and do not reflect any actual events" [4]
  • AI-generated videos have been used to create false narratives about this supposed incident [1] [2]

The analyses reveal that social media users and content creators who benefit from viral misinformation and engagement-driven content would have incentives to spread such fabricated stories, as they generate clicks, views, and social media engagement.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains significant misinformation by presupposing that Karoline Leavitt made a comment about Traoré. This assumption:

  • Perpetuates a completely false narrative that has been debunked by multiple fact-checking sources [1] [2]
  • Legitimizes AI-generated disinformation by treating fabricated content as if it were real
  • Demonstrates how easily false information can spread when people ask questions based on unverified social media content

The question itself appears to be influenced by AI-generated misinformation campaigns that have created fictional videos and content about this non-existent interaction [1] [2]. This represents a clear example of how modern disinformation tactics can create entirely fabricated events that then generate secondary discussions and questions, further amplifying the false narrative.

Want to dive deeper?
What was the context of Karoline Leavitt's Traoré comment?
How did Karoline Leavitt's campaign respond to the social media backlash?
What were the most common criticisms of Karoline Leavitt's Traoré comment on Twitter?
Did Karoline Leavitt's Traoré comment affect her poll numbers in the 2024 election?
How did other politicians react to Karoline Leavitt's Traoré comment on social media?