Is Kristi Nome having an affair?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, rumors of an affair between Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski have been circulating since at least September 2021 [1]. Multiple sources report on these allegations, but the evidence remains entirely based on anonymous sources and unverified claims [2] [1] [3].
Both Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski have publicly denied the allegations on multiple occasions [2] [1]. Importantly, Snopes was unable to independently verify the allegations despite investigating the claims [3] [1].
The reports primarily consist of:
- Anonymous sources citing incidents of them being seen together at various events [2]
- Speculation about their working and personal relationship [4]
- No conclusive evidence to prove the affair [4]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks several important contextual elements:
- The timeline of these rumors - they have been circulating for years, not as recent developments [1]
- The nature of their professional relationship - Lewandowski worked in Trump administration circles where he would naturally interact with governors like Noem [4]
- Speculation about Noem's marriage - some sources suggest potential marital issues between Kristi Noem and her husband Bryon, which adds context to why affair rumors might gain traction [5] [6]
Political motivations could benefit various parties:
- Political opponents would benefit from spreading unverified rumors to damage Noem's reputation
- Media outlets benefit from increased engagement when covering salacious political gossip
- Anonymous sources may have personal or political motivations for spreading unverified claims
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question "Is Kristi Noem having an affair?" presents several problematic elements:
- Treats unverified rumors as potentially factual by asking for confirmation rather than acknowledging the speculative nature
- Uses present tense ("having") which implies ongoing behavior, when the analyses show these are historical rumors that both parties have repeatedly denied [2] [1]
- Lacks acknowledgment that major fact-checking organizations have been unable to verify these claims [3] [1]
The framing suggests the rumors have credible basis when all available evidence shows they rely entirely on anonymous sources with no independent verification [1] [3]. This type of questioning can perpetuate unsubstantiated claims even when the factual record shows consistent denials and lack of verifiable evidence.