Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Is Kristi Nome having an affair?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, rumors of an affair between Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski have been circulating since at least September 2021 [1]. Multiple sources report on these allegations, but the evidence remains entirely based on anonymous sources and unverified claims [2] [1] [3].
Both Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski have publicly denied the allegations on multiple occasions [2] [1]. Importantly, Snopes was unable to independently verify the allegations despite investigating the claims [3] [1].
The reports primarily consist of:
- Anonymous sources citing incidents of them being seen together at various events [2]
- Speculation about their working and personal relationship [4]
- No conclusive evidence to prove the affair [4]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks several important contextual elements:
- The timeline of these rumors - they have been circulating for years, not as recent developments [1]
- The nature of their professional relationship - Lewandowski worked in Trump administration circles where he would naturally interact with governors like Noem [4]
- Speculation about Noem's marriage - some sources suggest potential marital issues between Kristi Noem and her husband Bryon, which adds context to why affair rumors might gain traction [5] [6]
Political motivations could benefit various parties:
- Political opponents would benefit from spreading unverified rumors to damage Noem's reputation
- Media outlets benefit from increased engagement when covering salacious political gossip
- Anonymous sources may have personal or political motivations for spreading unverified claims
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question "Is Kristi Noem having an affair?" presents several problematic elements:
- Treats unverified rumors as potentially factual by asking for confirmation rather than acknowledging the speculative nature
- Uses present tense ("having") which implies ongoing behavior, when the analyses show these are historical rumors that both parties have repeatedly denied [2] [1]
- Lacks acknowledgment that major fact-checking organizations have been unable to verify these claims [3] [1]
The framing suggests the rumors have credible basis when all available evidence shows they rely entirely on anonymous sources with no independent verification [1] [3]. This type of questioning can perpetuate unsubstantiated claims even when the factual record shows consistent denials and lack of verifiable evidence.