Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Did Kristi noem receive two business jets?
Executive Summary
Kristi Noem, serving as Secretary of Homeland Security, is reported to be associated with the federal purchase of two Gulfstream-class business jets that cost roughly between $172 million and $200 million, with reporting and political statements asserting the aircraft were acquired for DHS leadership use [1] [2] [3]. The core facts—two large private jets were ordered for DHS use—are supported by multiple recent accounts, but key details about funding lines, approval authority, and operational justifications remain contested or omitted in public reporting [1] [3] [2].
1. What the core claims actually say and how they differ from each other
Multiple outlets and political statements converge on the claim that the Department of Homeland Security authorized purchases of two Gulfstream business jets during October 2025, but the accounts diverge on the reported price tag and context. One prominent report states the coast guard purchase amounted to $172 million for two jets, while political statements and some press releases frame the cost as about $200 million, with both figures presented as taxpayer-funded procurement [1] [3] [2]. The consistent element across sources is the acquisition of two large executive aircraft; the inconsistent element is the precise cost and the narrative about approval timing and justification.
2. What reputable reporting says about who ordered and who will use the jets
Investigative reporting and agency statements identify the Department of Homeland Security as the buyer with the Coast Guard as the executing component, and they state the jets are intended for DHS leadership travel rather than routine Coast Guard missions. Reporting cites DHS-level procurement actions and a stated purpose of serving top DHS officials, including the Secretary, though none of the sources provide the full acquisition contract or flight-assignment logs in the public pieces reviewed [1] [2]. This leaves an evidentiary gap on the operational assignment and frequency of use by specific officials.
3. Conflicting numbers: $172 million versus $200 million — why they both appear
Different documents and political claims provide two close but distinct totals: $172 million and about $200 million. The lower figure appears in a major news report as the procurement price reported for the two Gulfstreams, while the higher amount appears in political statements and press materials characterizing the purchase as roughly $200 million. The discrepancy likely reflects rounding, inclusion of ancillary costs such as maintenance or mission equipment, or differing reporting on contract awards versus total program estimates, but current public accounts do not reconcile the gap [1] [3] [2].
4. Timing and optics: purchases during a shutdown and why critics object
Sources note the purchases occurred against the backdrop of a government shutdown and earlier DHS budget requests that had contemplated fewer or cheaper aircraft, which critics cite as a mismatch between stated priorities and spending choices. Political messaging frames the acquisition as ill-timed and extravagant, especially during fiscal constraints, and that framing has driven immediate pushback from appropriations committee Democrats and advocacy groups demanding explanations [3] [2]. The reporting documents the political optics but lacks the internal DHS rationale contemporaneously released to the public.
5. What’s missing from public reporting that matters for verification
Key missing documents include the full procurement contract, the approved budget line items, internal justification memos, and flight-assignment policies that would clarify who will actually use the jets and under what conditions. The currently cited public sources summarize purchases and political reactions but do not publish primary procurement records or Office of Inspector General reviews, which are necessary to conclusively determine whether standard acquisition protocols and appropriations rules were followed [1] [2]. Without those records, factual claims about legality and policy compliance remain incomplete.
6. How partisan framing shapes the coverage and public understanding
Political actors and press releases frame the story to fit strategic narratives: critics emphasize taxpayer cost and timing to attack leadership priorities, while DHS statements emphasize mission needs and continuity of operations. Both journalistic accounts and partisan statements carry clear agendas—one highlights potential misuse of funds, the other stresses operational necessity—so readers should weigh the substance of procurement documentation rather than relying solely on rhetoric [3] [2] [1]. Present public materials mix factual reporting with advocacy statements, making neutrality harder to discern.
7. Bottom line and what independent verification would require next
The best-supported factual summary is that the DHS authorized the purchase of two Gulfstream business jets for senior DHS use, with reported costs in the range of $172–$200 million, but essential procurement details remain unposted publicly. Independent verification requires release of contract awards, budget justifications, and internal approvals or an Office of Inspector General inquiry to address cost breakdowns and legal compliance; such documents would resolve the current discrepancies and answer who will use the jets and under what rules [1] [3] [2]. Until those records are released, claims that Noem personally “received” or privately owns the jets are unsupported by the available evidence.