Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Are the riots in LA that loot stores, burn cars attack ;aw enforcement and burn down building mostly peaceful?

Checked on June 14, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The evidence strongly indicates that the LA riots were not "mostly peaceful", with significant documented violence and property damage. The LAPD made hundreds of arrests [1], and specific incidents included:

  • Looting of multiple stores, including Apple and Adidas [2]
  • Burning of vehicles and attacks on law enforcement [3]
  • 23 businesses were looted, leading to Mayor Karen Bass declaring a local emergency [4]
  • 197 arrests and implementation of a curfew [4]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are missing from the original question:

  • Scale of Unrest: While violence did occur, most of Los Angeles was experiencing a normal day [5]. The unrest was more localized than social media portrayed.
  • Media Coverage Discrepancy: There's a significant divide in how different media outlets covered the events:
  • Some mainstream media outlets like CNN and MSNBC portrayed events as "peaceful protests" [6]
  • Social media platforms amplified sensationalized content, including AI-generated fake videos and recycled footage from previous protests [5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The question itself contains inherent bias by presenting a false dichotomy - suggesting riots with looting and violence could be "mostly peaceful." Several parties benefit from different narratives:

  • Media Organizations: Different outlets benefit from opposing narratives:
  • Some mainstream media benefits from downplaying violence [6]
  • Hyperpartisan accounts benefit from exaggerating the unrest for engagement [5]
  • Political Actors: State officials claimed demonstrations were "mostly peaceful" despite significant evidence to the contrary [4], while other politicians used the events to push different political agendas through misleading claims [5]

The reality appears to be more nuanced: while there was genuine violence and criminal activity as confirmed by law enforcement [3], the scale and scope of the unrest was both exaggerated by some sources and minimized by others.

Want to dive deeper?
What is the legal definition of peaceful protest versus riot in California?
How do mainstream and alternative media sources differ in their coverage of civil unrest in Los Angeles?
What are the historical patterns of civil unrest and media characterization in Los Angeles?
How do law enforcement agencies classify and respond to different types of civil demonstrations?
What role does media framing play in public perception of protests and riots?