Which members of Congress received the largest pro-Israel donations each election cycle from 2016 to 2024?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available reporting and data sources show that pro‑Israel groups dramatically increased spending in the 2022–2024 period and that a handful of members of Congress received six‑figure sums from AIPAC and allied vehicles in late‑2023 and 2024; for example, AIPAC reported contributions and outside spending in the 2024 cycle totaling tens of millions (AIPAC listed $51,848,113 in contributions and $37,860,200 in outside spending) and the group’s UDP/related super PACs spent roughly $55.4m as part of more than $100m of total activity in 2024 [1] [2] [3]. Public analyses singled out high recipients such as Rep. Ritchie Torres and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries receiving six‑figure PAC transfers in November 2024 [4].
1. Who the major funders are — and how much they spent
The single largest organized pro‑Israel political force documented in this reporting is AIPAC and its affiliated vehicles (including the United Democracy Project), which by one tally reported $51.8m in direct contributions and $37.9m in outside spending in the 2024 cycle and — when UDP is included — pushed total spending above $100m in 2024, according to multiple outlets [1] [2]. OpenSecrets and specialized trackers also compile pro‑Israel giving across PACs and donors for cycles through 2024 [5] [6].
2. Which members surfaced as top recipients in 2024
Journalistic filings and PAC reports identify certain high‑profile recipients of large AIPAC/UDP and pro‑Israel PAC disbursements in late 2023 and 2024. Reporting noted Ritchie Torres received more than $201,000 in AIPAC PAC donations in November 2024 and Hakeem Jeffries received just over $200,000 from AIPAC in that window [4]. The Guardian’s analysis found pro‑Israel donors gave over $58m to members of Congress in the most recent cycle and reported average per‑recipient differences between those deemed “supportive of Israel” (~$125,000 on average) and those deemed “supportive of Palestine” (~$18,000 on average) in their last elections [7] [8].
3. Historical cycles 2016–2022 — sources and limits
OpenSecrets maintains cycle‑by‑cycle data on “Pro‑Israel” industry/interest group giving back to at least 1998 through 2024, which is the repository reporters and researchers use to identify top recipients across multiple cycles [5] [9]. However, the provided documents in this packet do not deliver a clear, cycle‑by‑cycle ranked list of “largest recipients” for each election year from 2016 through 2024. Available sources do not mention a clean table naming the single largest recipient in each cycle 2016, 2018, 2020 and 2022; they point instead to aggregate totals and to specific high‑value recipients in 2024 [5] [9].
4. Why 2024 looks different — new vehicles and scale
Multiple accounts emphasize that 2024 was exceptional because AIPAC began directly funding candidates and because of the creation and use of large super PACs and outside spending vehicles. AIPAC’s United Democracy Project and allied spending reportedly allowed coordinated, large investments in dozens or hundreds of House and Senate contests in 2024 — a step‑change from earlier cycles [3] [2]. Independent trackers and OpenSecrets show a spike in pro‑Israel PAC activity for the 2023–2024 cycle, with some outlets citing $37m–$44.6m in cycle giving by pro‑Israel PACs and related groups [10] [11].
5. Competing narratives and political effects
Advocates of AIPAC’s approach frame the spending as routine political support for allies; AIPAC itself says it backed hundreds of bipartisan candidates and that 96% of its backed candidates won in 2024 [12] [13]. Critics and progressive outlets argue the money bought influence or chilled dissent in Congress and targeted high‑profile progressives [7] [14]. The Guardian’s analysis suggested a correlation between donation totals and lawmakers’ public positions in the early weeks of the Gaza war, while warning correlation is not proof of causation [7].
6. How to get a definitive, cycle‑by‑cycle answer
For a precise list of the single largest pro‑Israel recipients in each election cycle 2016, 2018, 2020, 2022 and 2024, consult OpenSecrets’ Pro‑Israel “Money to Congress” pages and AIPAC/UDP FEC filings for each cycle: OpenSecrets aggregates donors and recipients by cycle through 2024 [5] [9] and AIPAC’s organizational filings list cycle totals [1]. The materials provided here document totals and prominent 2024 recipients but do not include a ready, cited ranking naming the top recipient in each cycle from 2016 onward — available sources do not mention that exact, cycle‑by‑cycle list.
Limitations and transparency: this analysis relies only on the documents supplied above (news pieces, OpenSecrets summaries and AIPAC statements). Those sources document large sums and name notable 2024 recipients (Torres, Jeffries) and aggregate cycle totals, but they do not publish a single, verified, cycle‑by‑cycle ranked list of the largest pro‑Israel donation recipient for every election cycle from 2016 to 2024; to produce that list requires pulling FEC/OpenSecrets line‑item data for each cycle [5] [9] [4].