Any credible evidence documenting if the left or right commit more acts of violence

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided present a complex and multifaceted view of the issue of political violence, with different sources offering varying perspectives on the prevalence and severity of violence committed by left-wing and right-wing extremists. According to ^[1], right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence, with right-wing attacks accounting for approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001 ^[1]. Similarly, ^[1] suggests that right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence, with data showing that right-wing attacks account for the vast majority of fatalities from domestic terrorism ^[1]. In contrast, ^[2] notes that radical acts perpetrated by individuals associated with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent, while Islamist extremists are more likely to engage in violent acts globally ^[2]. Additionally, ^[3] suggests that assessing political violence in America is inherently subjective, and that the killing of Charlie Kirk is not representative of broader trends in political violence ^[3]. ^[4] provides examples of recent political violence in the U.S., including the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and notes that both Democrats and Republicans have been targeted, contradicting the claim that one side commits more acts of violence ^[4]. Overall, the analyses suggest that political violence is a complex issue with no clear consensus on which side commits more acts of violence.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key aspect missing from the original statement is the context of the data and the sources used to support the claims. For example, ^[1] and ^[1] rely on data showing that right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly, but ^[2] and ^[3] offer alternative perspectives that suggest the issue is more complex ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Additionally, ^[5] highlights that Americans are more likely to express anti-democratic views, including support for partisan political violence, when they believe the other party also holds those views, and that correcting misperceptions about the opposing party's views can decrease support for partisan violence ^[5]. This suggests that perceptions and misperceptions of political violence can play a significant role in shaping public opinion and behavior. Furthermore, ^[6] notes that liberals and conservatives have different views on which type of violence is a bigger problem, with liberals saying right-wing violence is a bigger problem and conservatives saying left-wing violence is a bigger problem ^[6]. This highlights the importance of considering the perspectives and biases of different groups when evaluating the issue of political violence.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement asks for credible evidence documenting if the left or right commit more acts of violence, but it does not provide any context or definition of what constitutes "acts of violence". This lack of clarity could lead to misinformation and bias in the interpretation of the data. For example, ^[1] and ^[1] suggest that right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly, but ^[2] and ^[3] offer alternative perspectives that suggest the issue is more complex ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Additionally, ^[4] notes that both Democrats and Republicans have been targeted in recent political violence, contradicting the claim that one side commits more acts of violence ^[4]. This suggests that the original statement may be overly simplistic and does not account for the complexity of the issue. Furthermore, ^[5] highlights that correcting misperceptions about the opposing party's views can decrease support for partisan violence, suggesting that the original statement may be perpetuating a false narrative that one side is more violent than the other ^[5]. Overall, the original statement may benefit from a more nuanced and contextualized approach to understanding the issue of political violence.