Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How many left wing extremist attacks occurred in the US during the 2024 election?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided do not give a specific number of left-wing extremist attacks that occurred in the US during the 2024 election [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. However, they consistently show that right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and lethal than left-wing violence, with right-wing ideologies fueling more than 70% of all extremist attacks and domestic terror plots in the US since 2002 [1]. The data also indicates that the majority of political violence comes from people following right-wing ideologies [3] [4]. A study removed from the Justice Department's website found that since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists [2].
- Key findings from the analyses include:
- Right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and lethal than left-wing violence [1] [2] [3] [4]
- Right-wing ideologies have fueled more than 70% of all extremist attacks and domestic terror plots in the US since 2002 [1]
- The majority of political violence comes from people following right-wing ideologies [3] [4]
- Far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists since 1990 [2]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original statement lacks context regarding the relative frequency and lethality of right-wing versus left-wing extremist attacks [1] [2] [3] [4]. Additionally, the statement does not consider the historical context of political violence in the US, which has been marked by a long history of right-wing extremist violence [3] [4] [2]. Alternative viewpoints, such as those presented in the analyses, highlight the importance of considering the broader trends and patterns in extremist violence rather than focusing solely on left-wing attacks [1] [2] [3] [4].
- Missing context includes:
- The relative frequency and lethality of right-wing versus left-wing extremist attacks [1] [2] [3] [4]
- The historical context of political violence in the US [3] [4] [2]
- Alternative viewpoints include:
- Considering the broader trends and patterns in extremist violence [1] [2] [3] [4]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading or biased by focusing solely on left-wing extremist attacks without considering the broader context of extremist violence in the US [1] [2] [3] [4]. This framing may benefit those who seek to downplay the threat of right-wing extremism and shift attention to left-wing extremism [1] [2]. The removal of a study from the Justice Department's website that showed far-right extremists were responsible for the bulk of ideologically motivated deaths may also indicate an attempt to suppress information that contradicts a particular narrative [2].
- Potential misinformation or bias in the original statement includes:
- Focusing solely on left-wing extremist attacks without considering the broader context of extremist violence [1] [2] [3] [4]
- Downplaying the threat of right-wing extremism and shifting attention to left-wing extremism [1] [2]
- Those who may benefit from this framing include:
- Individuals or groups who seek to downplay the threat of right-wing extremism [1] [2]