Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are there any examples of left-wing Islamic extremist groups?
Executive summary
There is no clear, widely recognized category of “left‑wing Islamic extremist” groups in the available reporting and academic literature: scholars and datasets treat “Islamist/Islamic” extremism and “left‑wing” extremism as distinct ideological families, and comparative studies list Islamist groups separately from leftist groups [1] [2]. Debates exist about alliances or overlaps — e.g., the contested concept of “Islamo‑leftism” in French politics — but that literature describes cooperation or rhetorical alliances, not armed left‑wing groups that espouse Islamism as a leftist doctrine [3].
1. What the major datasets and scholars say: separate ideological categories
Leading comparative studies and datasets classify extremist violence by ideology and, consistently, keep Islamist (or Islamic) extremism and left‑wing extremism as separate categories. A PNAS study that matched perpetrator names to group databases explicitly assigned ideological motivations and compared left‑wing, right‑wing and Islamist groups as distinct types [1]. Similarly, the START/UMD comparative analysis shows left‑wing, right‑wing and Islamist extremists as separate categories and finds systematic differences in violence and demographics across those categories [2]. Those authorities do not report a category of “left‑wing Islamic” armed groups; instead they locate Islamist groups in a separate family [1] [2].
2. Dominant pattern: Islamist groups are religiously motivated, left‑wing groups are secular or revolutionary
Reporting and reference sources describe Islamist or Islamic extremist organisations as motivated by a religious‑ideological project (e.g., Salafi‑jihadist goals such as establishing an Islamic state) and list al‑Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram and others under that heading [4] [5]. By contrast, traditional left‑wing terrorism (e.g., Marxist‑Leninist, anarchist, environmental militancy) is framed as secular revolutionary or anti‑capitalist activism and is catalogued separately [6]. The sources portray these as different ideological lineages rather than two labels for the same groups [4] [6].
3. Close contacts, tactical overlaps, and ideological alliances — not the same as “left‑wing Islamic” groups
Some scholarship and commentary identify tactical affinities, temporary alliances or shared causes (for example, anti‑Zionist campaigns) between actors on the left and some Islamist actors, especially in political movements or protest coalitions. The contested French concept of “Islamo‑leftism” (islamo‑gauchisme) is cited as an alleged alliance of some left‑wing intellectuals and Islamist actors around anti‑Zionism; that literature mostly documents political collaboration and rhetorical alignment rather than armed groups that blend Islamist theology with leftist economic program in a single extremist organisation [3]. Available sources do not present left‑wing armed groups that self‑identify primarily as Islamic in the way Islamist extremist organisations do [3] [4].
4. Why mislabeling or conflation happens — political and media incentives
Authors and analysts warn that categories can be conflated for political purposes or media narratives. For example, law reviews and reports note that racialization and political framing affect how attacks are labeled and covered, and that misclassification can be driven by political agendas [7]. The “Islamo‑leftism” debate in France has been used as a partisan tool: critics say the term has been popularized by right‑wing actors to discredit parts of the left, while defenders say it points to real alliances; research shows the term’s use is politically charged [3].
5. What the datasets cannot tell us — limitations and open questions
The comparative datasets and encyclopedic sources are strong on categorization but limited in capturing hybrid, local or small‑scale movements that mix religious and socioeconomic grievances. The PNAS and START/UMD work relies on existing group databases and naming conventions, which can miss newly emergent or ambiguous actors [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention any widely recognized, named groups that combine orthodox Islamist theology with a primary left‑wing revolutionary program and that are classified as “left‑wing Islamic extremist” organisations [1] [2] [3].
6. Bottom line for readers
If your question asks whether established extremist typologies or databases list “left‑wing Islamic extremist” groups as a recognized category, the answer from the available reporting and scholarship is no: Islamist and left‑wing extremisms are catalogued separately, and claims of an ideological fusion tend to appear in political polemics [1] [2] [3]. If you are asking whether there are instances of cooperation between some leftist actors and Islamist actors in campaigns or protests, the literature documents contested alliances and political debates—especially in France around “Islamo‑leftism”—but not armed groups that fuse the two ideologies as a standard classification [3] [4].