Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the legal claims against Biden
Executive Summary
President Joe Biden faces a mix of congressional allegations, state-led lawsuits, and declassified investigative claims alleging misconduct, concealment of health issues, unlawful executive actions, and family-related corruption; these claims are advancing in parallel through partisan oversight reports, state attorneys general suits, and disclosures from federal probes [1] [2] [3]. The factual record across recent public materials shows substantial litigation volume against the administration, specific high-profile civil and criminal threads tied to Hunter Biden, and contested intelligence materials declassified by congressional Republicans — each element presented with differing standards of proof and clear partisan framing that affects interpretation [4] [5] [3].
1. How Republicans Describe a Hidden Presidential Decline — What the Oversight Report Actually Says
A House Oversight Committee report released in late October 2025 asserts substantial evidence of significant mental and physical decline by President Biden and coordinated concealment by senior staff and his personal physician, framing the issue as both a public-health and transparency failure [1]. The committee’s language emphasizes concealment and coordinated messaging, and it was advanced by Republican leadership pursuing oversight priorities ahead of the 2026 cycle. The report’s central claims rest on interviews, internal White House communications, and medical summaries that the committee characterizes as showing deterioration and deliberate obfuscation. Independent medical assessment and corroborating third‑party evidence are not fully presented in the public summary, and the panel’s partisan composition and timing are relevant to interpreting the report’s force and motive [1].
2. State Attorneys General and the Wave of Lawsuits — Volume and Subjects Mattered
Since 2022 a large number of multistate and state-led lawsuits have challenged Biden administration policies across student loan relief, COVID rules, energy policy, and executive actions, with conservative state attorneys general frequently driving suits [4]. Public tallies show scores of suits filed over policy disputes; by April 2025 one prominent Republican AG framed his action as the 106th suit targeting the administration’s regulatory choices, notably an offshore drilling restriction challenged as unlawful [2]. These suits typically press statutory or constitutional claims and seek injunctive relief; outcomes have varied, with some courts staying or overturning rules and others deferring to agency discretion. The litigation landscape reflects policy disagreement channeled through legal remedies, producing incremental judicial pruning rather than a single dispositive adjudication against the presidency [4] [2].
3. Declassified FBI Material and Corruption Allegations — Sources, Contradictions, and Convictions
Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee released declassified FBI documents in September 2025 alleging corruption ties between Joe Biden, his son Hunter, and foreign actors, citing at least three confidential human sources and claiming meetings with Ukrainian officials to protect business interests [3]. One named source, Alexander Smirnov, is reported to have been convicted of lying in the underlying matter, which complicates the evidentiary weight of his allegations and raises questions about reliability [3]. The declassifications illuminate raw investigative material rather than adjudicated findings; prosecutors and defense counsel in criminal matters must still meet legal standards for charging and convicting. These disclosures have been used by Republican oversight to argue for criminality, while Democrats and some legal analysts warn that declassified memos do not equate to proof and may reflect biased sources or incomplete vetting [3].
4. Allegations of FBI Targeting and Procedure — Political Weaponization Claims
Separate disclosures have alleged that the FBI conducted tolling data collection on eight Republican senators’ phones as part of an investigation that later fed cases against former President Trump, an assertion that Republicans frame as evidence of politicized law enforcement under the Biden-era Justice Department [6]. The claim, publicized in October 2025, raises procedural concerns about how sensitive investigative techniques intersect with political actors; support for the allegation comes mainly from partisan congressional sources, and DOJ defenses emphasize lawful collection under court orders when warranted. The practical import is twofold: it fuels Republican narratives of bias in federal law enforcement, and it complicates public trust in investigations that touch senior political figures. Courts will ultimately adjudicate legality, but political ramifications are immediate and amplified by partisan media cycles [6].
5. The Hunter Biden Case and Presidential Pardon Dynamics — Legal Record and Outcomes
The criminal docket United States v. Biden records Robert Hunter Biden’s guilty plea on federal tax charges in 2024 and his subsequent pardon by President Biden, creating a compact legal fact pattern that critics call a conflict issue while supporters point to presidential pardon power [5]. The case produced motions to seal and procedural filings that underscore the magistrate and district-level handling of evidence and venue, and the pardon extinguished federal exposure for those counts. Legally, the pardon power is broad, but politically it raises questions about familial involvement, prosecutorial discretion, and the optics of self‑clemency for political kin. Courts and Congress have limited ability to contest a valid pardon, so the matter’s remaining arenas are political oversight and public debate rather than further federal criminal liability [5].