Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: LA governor decreased fire budget before LA wildfires
1. Summary of the results
The original statement oversimplifies a complex budgetary situation. While there was initially a $17.6 million (2%) decrease in the LA Fire Department's budget between 2023-24 and 2024-25 [1], subsequent negotiations and contract approvals actually resulted in a significant increase in funding. The budget grew from $819.6 million to $895.6 million, representing a net increase of $58.4 million [2]. Additionally, Governor Newsom, far from decreasing the budget, proposed a $2.5 billion increase for emergency response and wildfire preparedness in Los Angeles County [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original statement:
- The LAFD's budget has shown consistent growth over time, increasing from $674.27 million in 2019 to $819.64 million in 2025 [4]
- While there was an initial budget cut, the city had set aside funds for potential payroll changes [5]
- The city council approved $53 million in firefighter pay raises and $58 million for new equipment after the initial budget [6]
- The state government mobilized over 15,000 personnel and signed executive orders to support recovery efforts [7]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The statement appears to create a misleading narrative by:
- Conflating city and state actions: The statement implies the "LA governor" (presumably meaning California's governor) decreased the budget, when in fact Governor Newsom increased funding substantially [3]
- Ignoring subsequent budget increases: While focusing on the initial decrease, it omits the significant subsequent increases through union contracts and additional funding [8]
- Presenting competing narratives: There's a notable disconnect between Fire Chief Crowley's assertion that cuts "severely" impacted response capabilities and Mayor Bass's denial of meaningful reductions [6]
This situation demonstrates how different stakeholders might benefit from different narratives:
- Fire Department leadership (Chief Crowley) emphasizing budget constraints to advocate for more resources [1]
- City administration (Mayor Bass) downplaying budget impacts to maintain public confidence
- State government (Governor Newsom) highlighting increased funding to demonstrate proactive disaster response [7]