Has Emmanuel Macron publicly criticized U.S. conservative figures like Charlie Kirk?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Emmanuel Macron has been the target of repeated public accusations and conspiracies from U.S. conservative personalities — most prominently Candace Owens — but available sources do not show Macron himself publicly criticizing U.S. conservative figures such as Charlie Kirk; instead the record shows conservative figures publicly accusing Macron and the French government of wrongdoing (including extreme claims that Macron ordered assassinations) while French officials and mainstream outlets reject those claims [1] [2] [3].
1. Conservative figures have attacked Macron — often with sensational claims
Since mid‑2025 a string of U.S. conservative influencers have publicly alleged that President Macron or the French state engaged in sinister conduct. Candace Owens asserted on social platforms that a “high‑ranking” French government source told her Macron and his wife paid for plots including an alleged assassination attempt against her and linked France to Charlie Kirk’s killing; she repeated specific details such as training with the French Foreign Legion’s 13th brigade [1] [4]. Outlets from Euronews to France 24 reported these claims and described them as conspiracy theories circulated widely online [2] [3].
2. Macron’s response: legal action and official denials, not public back‑and‑forth insults
Rather than trading insults on social media, the Macrons pursued legal remedies. Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron filed a 219‑page defamation complaint in Delaware in July 2025 alleging a “campaign of global humiliation” tied to false claims about Brigitte Macron’s gender — a suit that mainstream reporting frames as central to the escalation with Owens [5] [4]. French ministries also publicly rejected specific allegations such as military training at alleged U.S. sites, with a ministry spokesperson disputing Owens’s account about Foreign Legion training [6] [2].
3. No sourced evidence Macron publicly attacked Charlie Kirk or similar U.S. conservatives
Available sources in this collection document accusations directed at Macron and legal or official pushback, but they do not report any instances where Emmanuel Macron publicly criticized U.S. conservative figures such as Charlie Kirk. Reporting instead records claims made by U.S. conservatives about Macron and France, and French denials and legal countermeasures [1] [2] [3]. If you are asking whether Macron publicly denounced or criticized Charlie Kirk, current reporting in these sources does not mention that.
4. Media coverage and verification: mainstream outlets treat these claims skeptically
Major international outlets covered Owens’s allegations but characterized them as unproven or false. Euronews and France 24 labelled the assassination claims and related theories as lacking evidence and part of a broader pattern of conspiratorial content tied to Owens’s legal troubles; fact‑checking and government spokespeople contradicted specific factual claims such as the existence of training at “Camp Riley” [2] [3] [6].
5. Two competing narratives: political/legal strategy vs. provocation as currency
One narrative, advanced in sources like Fortune, frames the Macrons’ defamation suit as a legal strategy to protect reputation after repeated false claims and to deter profitable disinformation [5]. The competing narrative — visible in conservative ecosystems and amplified by figures like Owens and endorsements from online personalities such as Telegram’s Pavel Durov — treats the allegations as plausible and casts Macron as an international antagonist [7] [8]. Coverage shows these narratives diverge sharply and are shaped by differing incentives: lawsuit and institutional credibility on one side, audience engagement and political grievance on the other [5] [7].
6. Limitations and what’s not in the record
These provided sources document public accusations by U.S. conservatives and French rebuttals, but they do not contain any primary evidence validating the assassination or training claims — outlets note the absence of proof and official denials [2] [3]. The sources also do not report Emmanuel Macron himself publicly criticizing Charlie Kirk or other named U.S. conservatives; available sources do not mention Macron making such statements [1] [2].
7. How to read statements in this environment
When influential media figures level extraordinary claims, mainstream outlets expect corroboration and governments respond with denials or legal remedies; that pattern appears here [2] [3] [5]. Readers should weigh (a) the source of allegations and potential incentives (audience growth, political positioning), (b) official replies and legal filings, and (c) independent verification — which, in these reports, is lacking for the most sensational claims [5] [2] [3].
If you want, I can pull verbatim excerpts from the cited reports showing the exact language of Owens’s allegations and the French responses so you can compare claims and denials side‑by‑side [1] [2] [3].