How much did Make America Great Again, Inc. spend on advertising during the 2024 election cycle and who were the vendors?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Make America Great Again Inc. (MAGA Inc.) spent roughly $376.9 million in outside/ad spending during the 2024 federal election cycle, with independent reporting and watchdogs estimating that approximately $349.9 million of that went specifically to media (television, radio and digital) buys and production [1] [2]. Public records and the sources provided document the donor flow into the super PAC — including large gifts that fueled the ad war — but the supplied reporting does not include a comprehensive, vendor-by-vendor list of every ad buyer or creative vendor used by MAGA Inc. [3] [4].
1. Total outside/ad spending — the headline figure
OpenSecrets’ summary of MAGA Inc. lists the group’s outside spending in the 2024 cycle at $376,948,611, a number that is the clearest single-cycle total available in the provided material and is used as the baseline figure for outside advertising and advocacy spending [1]. InfluenceWatch independently reports a nearly identical overall spend figure and emphasizes that the vast majority of that outlay was channeled into media — 91.81 percent — which InfluenceWatch quantifies as $349,927,765 [2].
2. Media vs. other categories — how the money was allocated
The reporting distinguishes media buys from other expenditures: InfluenceWatch breaks out roughly $15.25 million for campaign expenses and $10.22 million for strategy and research, with the remainder concentrated in media-related activity [2]. OpenSecrets’ categorizations likewise place advertising and media production in a specific “media” bucket (covering TV, radio, print and internet buys), which is how researchers and reporters attribute most outside spending to advertising rather than administrative or research line-items [5].
3. Where the money came from — big donors, concentrated funding
The funding that enabled this advertising surge was highly concentrated: public reporting points to Timothy Mellon’s multi‑million dollar gifts as among the largest single contributions to MAGA Inc. in 2024, and OpenSecrets records show the super PAC raised roughly $410.5 million across the 2023–2024 cycle, numbers that underscore how a small number of large donors can bankroll massive ad campaigns [3] [6]. Independent coverage and cycle trackers also flagged MAGA Inc. as a principal Trump-aligned super PAC whose donors and receipts made it one of the dominant outside spenders of the cycle [2] [1].
4. Vendors — what the record shows and what it doesn’t
Despite robust totals, the sources provided do not publish a line-by-line list of ad vendors, media-buy firms, creative houses or specific platform vendors retained by MAGA Inc.; OpenSecrets’ outside spending pages and the FEC detail totals and categories but, in these snippets, do not disclose an exhaustive vendor roster [5] [4]. Federal reporting regimes require disclosure of amounts and sometimes payees, but platform-level ad reporting and voluntary platform disclosures remain incomplete, and the Brennan Center and Wesleyan Media Project have documented gaps and inconsistent platform data that make vendor-level accounting difficult to reconstruct from public ad libraries alone [7] [8].
5. Interpretation, alternative views and implications
Taken together, the data show a near‑$377 million outside spend for MAGA Inc. in 2024 with roughly $350 million tied to media buys — a scale that shaped a national ad landscape and mirrored broader patterns of record-breaking outside spending documented by OpenSecrets and others [1] [2] [9]. Critics argue that this concentration of donor power and the opacity around exact vendor relationships illustrate regulatory and transparency shortfalls; defenders counter that super PACs are legally permitted to marshal independent resources and that public disclosure of totals — if not every vendor detail — exists in FEC and watchdog reporting [3] [4]. The supplied sources corroborate the magnitude of the spend and its media focus while also revealing the practical limits of public vendor-level disclosure in the 2024 cycle [2] [7].