Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are there critiques or defenses labeling Mahmood Mamdani as a communist and who authored them?
Executive Summary
There is no clear, sourced evidence in the provided material that Mahmood Mamdani — the academic author of Neither Settler nor Native and Good Muslim, Bad Muslim — has been widely labeled a communist; instead, the documents show critics and defenders debating the political identity of his son Zohran Mamdani, a New York politician. The most explicit critiques calling someone “communist” are authored by Bill Donohue and repeated by political figures including former President Donald Trump, while systematic analyses and fact checks describe those labels as mischaracterizations or disinformation [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. Who says “communist” and what exactly they claimed — follow the names and targets
The clearest single-author critique in the documents is Bill Donohue’s piece titled “MAMDANI’S COMMUNIST ROOTS,” which frames Zohran Mamdani’s political ties and upbringing as rooted in Marxism and asserts communist affiliation for the younger Mamdani while invoking his father’s Marxist background as context [1]. Former President Donald Trump is shown repeatedly using the “communist” label against Zohran in public remarks and threats to withhold federal funds, making the claim a partisan political attack rather than an academic classification [2]. The material attributes additional online amplification and partisan voices — including conservative commentators cited in Donohue’s piece — to the spread of the label, but those items point to Zohran, not Mahmood, as the named target [1] [2].
2. Data and organized attacks: social media campaigns and the analysts who called them out
Quantitative analysis in the provided material, led by Thenmozhi Soundararajan and Equality Labs, documents over 1.43 million social media posts that mislabeled Zohran Mamdani as a communist, arguing the term is often used as a slur to discredit pro-working-class platforms and that the campaign has huge reach and coordinated characteristics [3]. The Equality Labs report treats the “communist” label as part of disinformation and Islamophobic targeting, not as a careful ideological diagnosis. The presence of a large volume of mislabeled content supports an interpretation that the term functions as a political weapon online; the report’s authors explicitly identify the scale and character of the campaign rather than offering a biographical judgment about Mahmood Mamdani himself [3].
3. Fact-checks and expert pushback — defenders and neutral analysts who reject the label
Multiple fact-checking and academic sources presented in the material push back on the “communist” ascription for Zohran, describing his platform as democratic socialist and noting that his policy proposals do not include state seizure of industry or abolition of private property — core tenets of communism [4]. Defenders like Andres Bernal frame Zohran’s appeal as organizing skill and messaging rather than ideological extremism, arguing that Democrats can learn from his grassroots engagement [2]. These corrections and expert readings are used to cast doubt on the accuracy of the label and to separate rhetorical political attacks from substantive ideological analysis [4] [2].
4. Where Mahmood Mamdani fits in the record — scholarship, not a communist dossier
The materials that directly reference Mahmood Mamdani describe him as a political scientist and public intellectual focused on culture, postcolonial politics, and the politics of terrorism; his books and interviews engage scholarly critiques of Western policy and identity categories rather than proclamations of communist doctrine [5] [6] [7]. The supplied excerpts and table-of-contents material for Neither Settler nor Native and his interviews contain no documented instances of peers or major commentators labeling him a communist. In short, the evidentiary trail in these documents connects the “communist” accusation to his son Zohran and to online amplification, not to Mahmood himself [5] [6].
5. Bottom line: authors, agendas, and what the evidence actually supports
The strongest named critic in the supplied set is Bill Donohue, authoring a specific piece charging communist roots [1]. The most prominent public political repetition is by Donald Trump and allied conservative voices [2]. The major organized rebuttal and data-driven counterargument comes from Thenmozhi Soundararajan and Equality Labs, which characterize the label as widespread mislabeling and disinformation [3]. Independent fact-checking and academic commentary included here identify Zohran as a democratic socialist rather than a communist, and the materials contain no comparable authored critiques that directly and reliably label Mahmood Mamdani as a communist; the available evidence therefore supports the conclusion that the “communist” label is primarily a partisan attack on Zohran and an online smear amplified by commentators and some conservative authors [4] [3] [5].