Has Marjorie Taylor Greene received support from any other pro-Israel or foreign policy groups?

1. From “support for Israel” to public criticism — a documented trajectory

During her time in Congress Greene issued statements describing support for Israel’s statehood while also recording votes against specific aid packages — for example, her office explained why she voted no on an Israel aid package in November 2023 ^[1]. By mid–late 2025 multiple outlets report she publicly labeled Israel’s actions in Gaza “genocide” and moved to challenge U.S. support for Israeli operations, a marked break from the posture she held earlier in her tenure ^{[2] [5]}.

2. Did pro‑Israel groups endorse or support Greene? Reporting shows caution, not endorsements

Available sources do not show a named pro‑Israel organization publicly endorsing or funding Greene after her political shifts; instead, reporting records wariness. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency quotes the head of Democratic Majority for Israel expressing hesitation about her “transformation,” indicating skepticism rather than support ^[4]. A Times of Israel liveblog noted Greene posted a graphic boasting she had received zero campaign funds from AIPAC, which signals an absence of AIPAC financial backing in that claim rather than an endorsement ^[3].

3. Campaign finance and the AIPAC point — what the records cited in reporting imply

Greene publicly highlighted that she received “zero campaign funds from the pro‑Israel AIPAC lobby” in a social post covered by the Times of Israel ^[3]. That reporting frames her comment as a political signal — used in her argument that pro‑Israel interests were not financially tied to her campaign — but coverage does not supply primary campaign‑finance filings showing AIPAC’s official position. Available sources do not mention campaign‑finance records beyond Greene’s social media claim and news coverage repeating it ^[3].

4. Pro‑Israel actors’ reactions: skepticism and distance in major reporting

Multiple outlets covering Greene’s fall‑out with Donald Trump and her pivot on Israel report that mainstream pro‑Israel groups and leaders were hesitant to embrace her. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency explicitly noted Democratic Majority for Israel’s leader expressing hesitation about whether Greene’s shift should be trusted ^[4]. The Guardian, Reuters, The Times of Israel and Jewish Insider likewise portray Greene’s recent comments and conspiracy‑tinged questioning of Israel’s role in Epstein matters as alienating to pro‑Israel constituencies ^{[6] [7] [8] [9]}.

5. Conspiracy allegations complicated relationships with foreign‑policy actors

Several outlets report Greene floated theories suggesting Israeli pressure related to the Epstein files and invoked connections between Epstein and Israeli figures, coverage that heightened concern among pro‑Israel groups and commentators ^{[8] [10]}. The Independent and Times of Israel specifically highlight Greene’s public suggestions about foreign pressure and her referencing AIPAC in that context ^{[10] [3]}. These public statements, per reporting, appear to have increased pushback rather than generating support from established pro‑Israel organizations ^{[8] [10]}.

6. Alternative viewpoints and limitations in the sources

Some reporting notes Greene at times described herself as supportive of Israel’s statehood even while opposing specific U.S. aid measures, and Greene’s own office framed certain votes as grounded in policy or fiscal concerns ^{[1] [11]}. However, available sources do not provide comprehensive lists of every foreign‑policy group’s internal deliberations, nor do they include exhaustive campaign‑finance audits confirming all alleged outside support or opposition. Where specific organizations’ stances are reported (e.g., Democratic Majority for Israel), the coverage shows hesitation rather than endorsement ^[4].

7. Bottom line — no clear evidence of pro‑Israel group support; mainstream groups showed distance

In the reporting assembled here, established pro‑Israel groups are depicted as cautious or distancing themselves from Greene amid her pivot and conspiracy‑tinged rhetoric; none of the provided sources document a pro‑Israel or major foreign‑policy group publicly embracing or funding Greene after her 2025 shift ^{[4] [3] [8]}. If you want confirmation of specific PAC contributions or formal endorsements, current reporting does not cite those documents — campaign‑finance filings or direct statements from such groups would be the next sources to check (available sources do not mention detailed finance filings beyond Greene’s public claim) ^[3].