Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Have any credible news outlets reported business ties between Dr. Mehmet Oz and a firm called Apex Force (2023–2025)?
Executive Summary
A targeted review of credible news coverage from 2023 through 2025 finds no substantiated reporting that Dr. Mehmet Oz had business ties to a firm called “Apex Force.” Major outlets that examined Oz’s investments and potential conflicts of interest catalogued holdings in health insurers, pharmaceutical, fertility and supplement firms but did not identify any connection to a company named Apex Force [1] [2] [3]. The absence of reporting on Apex Force in these contemporaneous investigative pieces suggests either that such a relationship did not exist, that it was not discovered by journalists, or that the name refers to an unrelated entity; the available reporting supports the conclusion that credible outlets did not report business ties between Oz and Apex Force during 2023–2025 [4] [5].
1. Why major outlets focused on Oz’s healthcare investments, not Apex Force
Coverage of Dr. Mehmet Oz’s financial holdings in late 2024 and early 2025 centered on investments that would present direct conflicts if he assumed regulatory authority over Medicare and Medicaid. Investigations by national outlets listed concrete positions in health insurers, fertility clinics, pharmaceuticals and dietary supplement companies, often naming firms such as UnitedHealth Group, AbbVie and others as part of disclosed portfolios [1] [2] [3]. These articles were driven by document review and public disclosure records and therefore emphasized entities with traceable ownership or stock positions. If a company like Apex Force was not present in financial filings or reporting leads, it would not appear in these articles, and the existing reporting records show no mention of Apex Force in the context of Oz’s investments during 2023–2025 [1] [2].
2. What the specific investigations actually documented about Oz’s holdings
Detailed pieces from November 2024 and February 2025 cataloged Oz’s wealth sources and potential conflicts by tracing stock holdings, advisory roles and other business ties. These reports identified stakes in for‑profit healthcare companies and supplement sellers, and examined the implications for policy decisions if Oz took a regulatory post [1] [2] [3]. Those investigations relied on public filings and reporting standards used by credible outlets, and they explicitly list the companies they found; Apex Force does not appear on those lists. The absence of Apex Force in multiple, independently produced inventories of Oz’s holdings strengthens the finding that mainstream investigative reporting did not corroborate a connection to that firm [2] [4].
3. Could Apex Force exist under a different name or be overlooked by reporters?
Journalists can miss opaque or newly formed entities, subsidiaries, or shell companies that don’t appear in straightforward public filings; this creates a plausible gap where a tie could theoretically exist but remain undisclosed. Some sources in the reviewed corpus reference organizations named “APEX” in unrelated contexts — a New Zealand union and a roofing firm — illustrating that similar names can refer to disparate entities and risk conflation in searches [5] [6]. Given the reviewed articles’ methodology of following traceable filings and public records, the most likely explanations for the lack of reporting on Apex Force are that the firm is unrelated, not part of Oz’s disclosed portfolio, or that no credible evidence tying Oz to such a firm was available to reporters between 2023 and 2025 [6] [3].
4. How credible outlets and the public record constrain conclusions
Credible outlets rely on verifiable records, on‑the‑record documents and corroboration; their negative reporting — the consistent absence of Apex Force in multiple investigations of Oz’s finances — functions as evidence. Multiple reputable articles across late 2024 and early 2025 document holdings and potential conflicts of interest while consistently omitting any Apex Force connection, indicating that investigative journalists did not find such a tie in the public record or through reporting channels [1] [2] [4]. That pattern does not prove absolute nonexistence, but under journalistic standards it is a strong indicator that the claim of a business tie was not supported by available evidence during the 2023–2025 period [3].
5. Bottom line: what the evidence supports and outstanding caveats
The preponderance of contemporaneous reporting from credible news outlets shows no documented business relationship between Dr. Mehmet Oz and a firm named Apex Force between 2023 and 2025. Investigative pieces that catalogued Oz’s investments and potential conflicts identified numerous health‑sector companies but did not list Apex Force, and unrelated uses of “Apex” in other reporting demonstrate potential for mistaken identity [1] [2] [6]. Remaining caveats: journalists can only report what is verifiable, undisclosed private arrangements or entities with different legal names could escape detection, and follow‑up reporting could change this record if new documents emerge. Based on the available credible coverage through 2025, however, there is no reported tie between Oz and Apex Force [1] [4].