Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is the mission and funding of MeidasTouch?
Executive Summary
MeidasTouch is a progressive, self-described “pro‑democracy” media network that launched in 2020 and grew from viral anti‑Trump ad campaigns into a hybrid operation combining a news network, subscription content and a political action committee. Its funding mixes individual donations reported to the PAC, small‑donor membership revenue and commercial lines such as a shop and advertising; detailed, consolidated financials for the media network itself remain limited in the available records [1] [2] [3].
1. How MeidasTouch frames its purpose — a media crusade born from opposition
MeidasTouch publicly defines itself as a pro‑democracy, progressive media entity that explicitly set out to counter Donald Trump’s reelection and “take the oxygen out of the news cycle” around him. The founders — three brothers identified as Ben, Brett and Jordy Meiselas — launched the group in March 2020 as a political operation focusing on viral video ads designed to influence public attention and election outcomes. Over time, the operation expanded into a broader network producing podcasts, videos and subscription‑style community offerings they call the Meidas Mighty. The founders’ origins as an explicitly anti‑Trump Super PAC and the organization’s stated mission to “defeat Trumpism” are consistently reported across profiles and the group’s own descriptions [1] [4] [5].
2. What the PAC filings reveal — money, donors and campaign spending
Federal filings and tracking by political‑finance aggregators show MeidasTouch operating as a hybrid PAC/super‑PAC with millions raised and spent in the 2020 cycle, focused largely on media buys. OpenSecrets reports the committee raised roughly $2.7 million in the 2021–2022 cycle, recorded substantial expenditures (including independent expenditures), and relied on a mix of contributions from individuals giving $200 or more as well as larger gifts. Earlier reporting indicates the group raised close to $5 million in its first year and allocated a large share of its budget to broadcast and web ads. The PAC structure and reported receipts show a funding profile typical of politically active media PACs: significant advertising outlays financed by individual donors [6] [2] [7].
3. Revenue beyond the PAC — memberships, shop and advertising
MeidasTouch’s media arm operates revenue lines separate from PAC filings: patron/membership tiers, merchandise sales, and advertising or sponsorship revenue. The network promotes paid membership tiers (Patreon‑style) and a shop on its site, and lists a small staff producing podcasts and news content. Public descriptions and organizational self‑reports indicate these streams are an important part of sustaining the network’s journalism and community engagement, but they are not captured in PAC disclosure forms and so are less transparent in aggregate. Profiles note annual revenue under $5 million in early 2025 and a donor base in the tens of thousands, though source data is limited and not fully itemized [4] [3].
4. Credibility, partisanship and the editorial tilt — a media actor with an advocacy history
MeidasTouch’s roots as an explicitly anti‑Trump Super PAC shape both its editorial stance and outside perceptions: the network combines activism and journalism, which raises predictable questions about partisan bias and credibility. Critics point to the organization’s formative mission to defeat Trump as evidence of advocacy that colors editorial choices, while supporters argue the network fills a media niche focused on accountability reporting. The dual roles — running political ads and producing news content — complicate impartiality assessments because the advertising and PAC records document political goals that dovetail with editorial output [1] [5] [3].
5. What’s transparent — and what remains opaque about funding
Financial transparency is mixed: PAC contributions and expenditures are publicly reported, offering a clear line on political spending, major donors and ad buys. By contrast, the media network’s internal revenue from memberships, shop sales and advertising is not captured in federal PAC disclosures, and publicly available estimates vary. Some profiles cite small‑donor averages and earlier fundraising totals, while organizational claims report subscriber counts and audience metrics; neither set of figures provides a consolidated, auditable financial statement for the entire enterprise. The gap between PAC disclosure and private commercial revenue means the full scope of funding supporting editorial operations remains incompletely accounted for in the available documents [2] [1] [3].
6. Bottom line for readers — mission-driven media with mixed funding transparency
MeidasTouch is best understood as a mission‑driven progressive media network that evolved from a politically active Super PAC into a multi‑platform content operation. PAC records confirm substantial political fundraising and media spending tied to electoral goals, while membership, merchandise and advertising sustain the network’s journalism — but those commercial streams are less transparently reported. For readers evaluating MeidasTouch’s output, the organization’s dual identity as both political actor and news producer is a material fact: it explains the editorial orientation and clarifies why financial disclosure differs between the PAC side and the media business side [6] [4] [3].