Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Has Mike Lee expressed support for any bipartisan legislation in 2024?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, Mike Lee has expressed support for at least one bipartisan legislation in 2024. The most significant finding comes from a May 2024 report indicating that Lee introduced the Opportunities for Fairness in Farming (OFF) Act, which was explicitly described as a bipartisan bill with a mix of Democratic and Republican sponsors [1].
However, the majority of sources show Lee primarily focused on partisan initiatives throughout 2024. Multiple analyses indicate he introduced various bills and resolutions that were predominantly supported by Republican co-sponsors only [2]. Notable examples include his resolution calling for an investigation into James Comey [3] and the Ending Racism in Government Contracting Act, though the latter's bipartisan nature remains unclear despite receiving support from various organizations [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks important context about Lee's broader legislative agenda in 2024. While one bipartisan effort was identified, Lee's most prominent and controversial proposal involved selling millions of acres of public land in Utah and throughout the West [5] [6] [7]. This initiative has been met with opposition from environmental groups and some Democrats, suggesting it represents a highly partisan approach rather than bipartisan cooperation [5].
The analyses reveal that Lee's public land sale proposal was positioned as part of President Donald Trump's major spending package, which inherently makes it a partisan Republican initiative rather than a bipartisan effort [7]. This context is crucial because it demonstrates that while Lee may have supported one bipartisan bill, his most high-profile legislative efforts in 2024 were decidedly partisan.
Missing from the original question is any consideration of the scope and significance of Lee's bipartisan efforts compared to his partisan initiatives. The OFF Act appears to be a relatively minor piece of legislation focused on farmer protections, while his public land proposals represent major policy shifts affecting millions of acres.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question itself is neutral and factual, seeking information rather than making claims. However, the question could be interpreted as seeking to establish Lee's bipartisan credentials without acknowledging the limited scope of such efforts.
The analyses reveal potential bias in how Lee's legislative activities are framed. While one source explicitly identifies the OFF Act as bipartisan [1], multiple other sources focus exclusively on his partisan initiatives without mentioning any bipartisan efforts [2] [5] [8] [3]. This suggests that either Lee's bipartisan efforts are minimal and overshadowed by partisan activities, or that different sources have varying perspectives on what constitutes meaningful bipartisan cooperation.
The timing of sources is also relevant: the most recent analyses from June 2025 focus heavily on Lee's controversial public land proposals [5] [7], while the bipartisan farming legislation was reported in May 2024 [1], suggesting that Lee's legislative focus may have shifted toward more partisan initiatives as 2024 progressed.