Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: 2000 missing Ballots found at a workers home but the ELECTION was not rigged at all

Checked on May 14, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement contains a mixture of accurate and misleading information. While it's true that approximately 1,822 ballots (not 2,000) were found at a transport worker's home, they were discovered with security seals intact and were properly counted [1]. Multiple high-ranking officials, including CISA Director Jen Easterly and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, have confirmed there is no evidence of any malicious activity or cheating that impacted election integrity [2] [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original statement:

  • The ballots were accidentally kept by a transport worker, not deliberately hidden [1]
  • The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) confirmed that the second count matched the initial count, showing no impact on results [1]
  • This was an isolated incident among thousands of polling locations [1]
  • Election systems are independent and secure, with variations in voter turnout being normal between elections [3]
  • Previous allegations of systematic fraud, such as those made in the "2000 Mules" documentary, have been thoroughly debunked - experts note that cell phone tracking data isn't precise enough to prove ballot fraud [4]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The statement appears designed to create doubt about election integrity while simultaneously dismissing concerns, which presents several issues:

  • The use of "but" in the statement implies a contradiction where none exists - finding misplaced ballots (which were properly handled once discovered) doesn't indicate rigging
  • The number is inflated (2000 vs. actual 1822) which could be meant to make the incident seem more significant [1]
  • The statement ignores the robust security measures in place, confirmed by multiple expert sources including Common Cause representative Ishan Mehta [3]

Those who benefit from promoting election fraud narratives often include:

  • Political figures seeking to delegitimize electoral losses
  • Media outlets and content creators seeking engagement through controversial claims, as demonstrated by the "2000 Mules" documentary producers [4]
  • Groups attempting to undermine public confidence in democratic institutions
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?