Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What were the most common types of voter fraud prosecuted in the 2020 and 2024 elections?
Executive Summary
The available materials show that prosecutions tied to the 2020 and 2024 election cycles most commonly involved fraudulent voter registrations, improper use or certification of absentee/mail ballots, and isolated cases of noncitizen voting, with the Justice Department emphasizing enforcement of a range of election-crime statutes. Compilation studies and press releases report hundreds of convictions spanning several election cycles and recent, high-profile indictments and state prosecutions underscore registration fraud and false claims of citizenship as focal points of enforcement efforts [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. The record is uneven across jurisdictions, and official summaries stress legal tools rather than a single dominant fraud pattern [6] [7].
1. What the claim list actually asserts — extracting the core allegations that matter
The set of source excerpts advances several core claims: that there were hundreds of voter-fraud convictions across multiple states between 2016 and 2020, that prosecutions encompass categories from criminal convictions to civil penalties, and that recent criminal actions in 2024–2025 include alleged paid canvasser registration fraud and prosecutions for illegal noncitizen voting. The empirical foundation for the first claim is a compiled count of 306 convictions across 37 states covering 2016–2020, which signals that prosecutions occur but are numerically limited relative to total ballots cast [1]. The categorical taxonomy in the materials further lists common offense types — fraudulent absentee-ballot use, ineligible voting, vote-buying and registration fraud — establishing a typology officials use to describe election crimes [2]. Recent press releases and indictments reiterate these categories while emphasizing prosecutorial vigilance [5] [6] [7] [3] [4].
2. What recent prosecutions reveal — registration fraud and false citizenship claims in focus
Contemporary enforcement actions provide the clearest window into what prosecutors prioritize: paid canvasser schemes and false citizenship assertions. A Pennsylvania investigation led to charges against seven people in a 2024 registration-fraud case alleging canvassers were paid by signatures and submitted fraudulent registration forms across party lines, highlighting how financial incentives can drive registration offenses and prompt state criminal cases [3]. A federal indictment charging a Canadian citizen with illegally registering and voting in 2022 and 2024 demonstrates prosecutors pursuing noncitizen voting where false certification of U.S. citizenship on registration documents is evident [4]. These cases illustrate prosecutorial focus on documentary misrepresentation and third-party schemes rather than mass ballot tampering narratives [3] [4].
3. Broader pattern across federal guidance and prior compilations — the DOJ’s emphasis and the numeric context
Justice Department materials from 2024 and 2025 reiterate that its Criminal Division and U.S. Attorneys enforce laws against a range of election offenses — destruction of ballots, vote-buying, multiple voting and other frauds — but the department frames its work as targeted enforcement rather than systemic-fraud claims [5] [6] [7]. The earlier compilation showing 306 convictions across 37 states (2016–2020) places recent actions in context: convictions occur, but historically they represent a small fraction of election activity and cover diverse, often localized schemes [1]. Heritage Foundation categorization adds that prosecutions, judicial findings and civil penalties are different legal outcomes, which complicates comparing raw numbers across sources [2]. The upshot is that federal and state enforcement has been active but dispersed across many offense types and geographies.
4. What’s missing from the narrative — data gaps, comparability problems, and partisan framing risks
Available sources show clear prosecutorial examples but leave critical gaps: there is no standardized national dataset in these excerpts isolating the single most common prosecuted offense for 2020 vs 2024, and comparisons across years are hampered by differing categorizations (criminal conviction vs judicial finding vs civil penalty) and by varying local enforcement priorities [2] [1]. Media and political actors sometimes highlight individual prosecutions to suggest widespread fraud, but the compiled conviction totals and DOJ statements frame the phenomena as isolated, diverse offenses rather than proof of systemic election subversion [1] [5]. Readers should note potential agendas: state prosecutors may highlight wins to show toughness, advocacy groups may compile cases to argue broader points, and federal releases emphasize legal authority and safeguards [6] [2].
5. Bottom line and practical takeaways — what the evidence responsibly supports
The evidence supports a clear, narrow conclusion: prosecutions tied to the 2020 and 2024 cycles were most commonly about fraudulent registrations, misuse or miscertification of absentee ballots, and isolated noncitizen voting cases, with recent high-profile matters emphasizing paid-registration schemes and false citizenship claims [1] [2] [3] [4]. The Justice Department’s public statements and regional press releases confirm sustained enforcement attention but do not document a single dominant nationwide fraud pattern; the cases are numerically limited and legally varied, and interpreting them as proof of widespread electoral fraud overstates what the cited records show [5] [7].