How many Muslim refugees were admitted to the US during Obama's administrations and how does that compare to other administrations?

Checked on January 26, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

A clear, single-number answer is not available in the supplied reporting: the sources document that the Obama administration admitted a large number of Muslim refugees in specific years and that Muslim refugees made up sizable shares of admissions (for example, 38,901 Muslim refugees in FY2016, about 46% of that year’s total) but do not provide a single, consolidated total for all Muslim refugees admitted across both Obama terms that can be cited from these documents [1] [2]. Comparisons to the Trump years show both a sharp drop in overall refugee admissions under Trump and varying shares of Muslims among those admitted, so any direct apples-to-apples multi-year Muslim-refugee totals require combining datasets that are not fully provided here [3] [4].

1. Obama-era peaks and the clearest datapoints

The most concrete figure available in the reporting is fiscal year 2016, when 38,901 Muslim refugees entered the United States—about 46% of the roughly 85,000 refugees resettled that year—making 2016 a record year for Muslim refugee admissions under Obama [1] [2]. The Obama administration set and largely met high refugee ceilings in its final years, with an 85,000 ceiling for FY2016 and a 110,000 goal for FY2017 [3] [5]. These ceilings and the composition of origin countries—Democratic Republic of the Congo, Iraq, Syria and Somalia among the top sources in late Obama years—help explain why Muslim refugees made up a large share in 2016 [2].

2. Broader patterns across Obama’s terms (shares, not a single total)

Analyses that break admissions into windows find that Muslims accounted for roughly 23% of refugees in the first three years of Obama’s first term and about 40% in the first three years of his second term, according to the Center for Immigration Studies’ (CIS) comparison of three-year windows—figures that reflect shifts in origin countries and Administration ceilings but are presented as period shares rather than a summed Muslim headcount for the entire presidency [4]. Annual admissions under Obama varied—74,654 in 2009, a dip in 2011 to 56,424, and then rises toward the later years—so aggregating a reliable Muslim-total requires year-by-year religious-composition data that is not fully tabulated in the supplied reporting [6].

3. Comparison with the Trump administration: fewer refugees overall, mixed shares

Under Trump the total number of refugees admitted fell sharply; by Sept. 2019 about 76,200 refugees had been admitted since his inauguration, compared with nearly 85,000 in FY2016 alone under Obama [3]. CIS notes that in Trump’s early years Muslims accounted for over 22% of admissions in a three-year window, and other CIS snapshots report a 32% Muslim share in the first 11 months of Trump’s term—demonstrating that the Muslim share varied year-to-year even as absolute totals declined under Trump [4] [7]. The decisive change between administrations is therefore both in scale—fewer total refugees under Trump—and in shifting regional/country-of-origin mixes that changed the religious composition of arrivals [3] [8].

4. Syrian intake and partisan flashpoints

Reporting highlights Syria as a focal point: in 2016 the Obama administration admitted 12,587 Syrians, nearly all of whom were Muslim, a fact that pushed the Muslim share higher that year and became a political flashpoint in congressional and presidential debates [1] [9]. Some partisan outlets and lawmakers used these composition facts to argue policy implications; the supplied sources include both neutral data summaries (Pew, CIS) and politically charged commentary (senatorial press material) that must be read as advocacy as well as evidence [1] [9].

5. Limits of the public record in the supplied reporting

The supplied reporting allows confident statements about annual compositions (notably FY2016) and three-year shares for administrative windows, and it documents the dramatic overall decline in refugee admissions under Trump, but it does not provide a single, source-cited sum of all Muslim refugees across the entire Obama presidency—so a precise multi-year total cannot be asserted from these documents alone without further dataset aggregation from State Department yearly detailed tables [1] [4] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the State Department’s year-by-year refugee admission tables showing religious affiliation for 2009–2016?
How did the geographic origin of refugees (country of origin) drive the religious composition of U.S. refugee admissions under Obama and Trump?
What methodology do organizations like Pew and CIS use to calculate refugee religion shares, and where do their figures diverge?