Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Can the national guard refuse to follow president orders

Checked on June 9, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The question of whether the National Guard can refuse presidential orders is complex and depends on specific circumstances. While the president has broad authority to federalize the National Guard [1] and this power has been used historically, particularly during school desegregation [2], there are several important limitations:

  • Governors maintain significant control and can potentially resist federal orders [3]
  • States have demonstrated autonomy in National Guard matters, with the federal government's main leverage being funding withdrawal [4]
  • Military personnel, including the National Guard, are not required to follow unlawful orders [5]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question omits several crucial contextual elements:

  • The president's authority is governed by specific legal frameworks, including the Insurrection Act and 10 USC 13 sections 251-255 [1]
  • Presidential determinations for National Guard deployment are not subject to judicial review [1]
  • There's a fundamental principle that military forces are subordinate to civilian leadership, but this has limits [5]
  • Domestic military deployment should be considered a last resort [6]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question oversimplifies a complex legal and constitutional relationship. Several stakeholders have different interests in how this authority is interpreted:

  • Federal Government: Benefits from broader interpretation of presidential powers to maintain federal authority [2] [1]
  • State Governments: Benefit from maintaining autonomy over their National Guard units, as demonstrated by recent court rulings [4]
  • Military Leadership: Has a vested interest in maintaining clear guidelines about lawful vs. unlawful orders, as stated by retired General Michael Hayden [5]

The question also fails to acknowledge that historically, presidential federalization of the National Guard has been rare, occurring only four times in the last century [2], suggesting that this power is used with significant restraint.

Want to dive deeper?
What is the legal difference between National Guard state and federal activation?
Can state governors override presidential orders to deploy National Guard troops?
What happened when governors refused to federalize National Guard during civil rights era?
Does the Posse Comitatus Act limit how presidents can use National Guard domestically?
What constitutional powers do presidents have over state National Guard units?