Which national social justice organizations have publicly announced formal collaborations with Indivisible?
Executive summary
Indivisible has publicly described working with allied organizations and coalitions, and one independent report names specific national partners: Planned Parenthood and ADAPT [1] [2]. The sources provided do not supply a comprehensive roster of formal national social‑justice collaborators beyond those mentions, and Indivisible’s own materials emphasize broad coalition work without an exhaustive public list [3] [4].
1. What the sources actually document about “collaborations”
Indivisible’s official pages characterize the organization as a national movement that supports local groups, offers training, and “builds partnerships” and coalitions to advance progressive policies [1] [5], but those pages focus on structure, trainings, grant programs, and local/state coordination rather than publishing a single, detailed list of formal national social‑justice partners [3] [6].
2. Named national social‑justice organizations in the reporting
A third‑party profile on Onward Together explicitly states that Indivisible worked “together with organizations like Planned Parenthood and ADAPT” during major campaigns such as opposing the ACA repeal effort, which is the clearest public naming of national social‑justice partners found in the provided reporting [2].
3. What “worked together” appears to mean in these accounts
The Onward Together piece frames the partnership as coordinated action to direct people to town halls and mobilize calls and attendance, describing a practical campaign alliance rather than a formal merger or single‑contract partnership; Indivisible’s own materials likewise describe coalition activity, training, and coordinated campaigns as core tactics [2] [1].
4. Evidence of local and state partnerships versus national alliances
Multiple Indivisible pages and state/local Indivisible sites emphasize alliances with local groups—NAACP chapters, League of Women Voters, regional coalitions, and state‑level allies—showing abundant collaboration at subnational levels but not translating those lists into a confirmed, comprehensive national partner registry in the sourced reporting [7] [8] [9].
5. Limits in the available reporting and alternative interpretations
The available reporting names Planned Parenthood and ADAPT as organizations that “together” acted with Indivisible on specific campaigns [2], but the Indivisible site does not publish an authoritative catalog of formal, ongoing national social‑justice collaborations in the provided extracts [3] [4]; therefore, it is possible Indivisible has other formal partnerships not documented here, or that “collaboration” in public accounts ranges from one‑off campaign coordination to deeper institutional alliances—sources differ in specificity [1] [6].
6. Why the distinction matters for readers and researchers
Knowing which organizations are formally partnered with Indivisible versus those that have coordinated episodically affects how observers assess strategic alliances, resource flows, and shared messaging; the reporting confirms at least two national social‑justice organizations—Planned Parenthood and ADAPT—have been publicly named as collaborators in major Indivisible campaigns [2], while Indivisible’s own materials stress broad coalition work and support for local affiliates without presenting a definitive public roster [3] [5].